Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604123›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Explaining the negative effects of patient participation in patient safety: an exploratory qualitative study in an academic tertiary healthcare centre in the Netherlands.

Michael Van der Voorden, Kees Ahaus, Arie Franx

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Safety Culture Through Patient Voice: Qualitative Validation of the Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture Scale (PaPSC) in Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Neglected Role of Patients in Promoting Patient Safety.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Van der VoordenObstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands m.vandervoorden@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-9301
Kees AhausErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Department of Health Services Management & Organization, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Arie FranxObstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough previous studies largely emphasize the positive effects of patient participation in patient safety, negative effects have also been observed. This study focuses on bringing together the separate negative effects that have been previously reported in the literature. This study set out to uncover how these negative effects manifest themselves in practice within an obstetrics department.

designAn exploratory qualitative interview study with 16 in-depth semistructured interviews. The information contained in the interviews was deductively analysed.

settingThe study was conducted in one tertiary academic healthcare centre in the Netherlands.

participantsPatients (N=8) and professionals (N=8) from an obstetrics department.

resultsThe results of this study indicate that patient participation in patient safety comes in five different forms. Linked to these different forms, four negative effects of patient participation in patient safety were identified. These can be summarised as follows: patients' confidence decreases, the patient-professional relationship can be negatively affected, more responsibility can be demanded of the patient than they wish to accept and the professional has to spend additional time on a patient.

conclusionThis study identifies and brings together four negative effects of patient participation in patient safety that have previously been individually identified elsewhere. In our interviews, there was a consensus among patients and professionals on five different forms of participation that would allow patients to positively participate in patient safety. Further studies should investigate ways to prevent and to mitigate the potential negative effects of patient participation.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatientsFemaleHumansNetherlandsPatient SafetyPregnancyQualitative ResearchTertiary Health CareHealth & safetyOBSTETRICSQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36604123
PMCPMC9827266
OpenAlexW4313557381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.