Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36603414›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2023

Implementation of 26 Gy in five fractions over 1 week adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer: Prospective report of acute skin toxicity and consideration of resource implications.

K Nugent, E Quinlan, S Cleary, H O'Driscoll, C Rohan, J Trousdell, J Williams, M Dunne, O McArdle, F K Duane

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K NugentSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
E QuinlanSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
S ClearySt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
H O'DriscollSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
C RohanSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J TrousdellSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J WilliamsSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M DunneSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
O McArdleSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F K DuaneSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: fduane@tcd.ie.
St. Luke's Hospital · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn March 2020, a 1-week adjuvant breast radiotherapy schedule, 26 Gy in 5 fractions, was adopted to reduce the risk of COVID19 for staff and patients. This study quantifies acute toxicity rates and the effect on linac capacity. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a report of consecutive patients receiving ultrafractionated breast radiotherapy ( ± sequential boost) Mar-Aug 2020. Virtual consultations assessed acute skin toxicity during treatment and weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 post treatment using CTCAE V5 scoring criteria. The number of linac minutes saved was estimated accounting for boost and DIBH use.

resultsIn total, 128/135 (95%) patients, including 31/33 boost patients, completed at least 3/5 assessments. 0/128 (0%) reported moist desquamation not confined to skin folds or minor bleeding (Grade 3), 41/128 (32%) reported brisk erythema, moist desquamation confined to skin folds or breast swelling (Grade 2), 62/128 (48%) reported faint erythema or dry desquamation (Grade 1) as their worst skin toxicity, with the remaining 20% reporting no skin toxicity. The highest prevalence of grade 2 toxicity occurred week 1 following treatment (20%), reducing to 3% by week 4. There was no difference in toxicity between those who received a boost versus not (p = 1.00). Delivering this schedule to 135 patients over six months saved 21,300 linac minutes and 1485 hospital visits compared to a 3-week schedule.

conclusionRapidly implementing ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy is feasible and acute toxicity rates are acceptable even when followed by boost.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAcute toxicityAdjuvant radiotherapyBreast cancerResource implicationsUltrafractionation

Identifiers

PMID36603414
OpenAlexW4311692533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.