Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36603157›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2023

Comparative physiological anthropogeny: exploring molecular underpinnings of distinctly human phenotypes.

Michael Vaill, Kunio Kawanishi, Nissi Varki, Pascal Gagneux, Ajit Varki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael VaillCenter for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kunio KawanishiCenter for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-3467
Nissi VarkiCenter for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9839-1254
Pascal GagneuxCenter for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-9838
Ajit VarkiCenter for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2206-975X

Funding

Training Program in Basic Clinical GeneticsT32GM008666 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMILTON, BRUCE A · 1998 to 2021
$8.6M
Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
BIOSYNTHESIS AND REGULATION OF SUBSTITUTED SIALIC ACIDSR01GM032373 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VARKI, AJIT P · 1985 to 2022
$6.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032373NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogeny is a classic term encompassing transdisciplinary investigations of the origins of the human species. Comparative anthropogeny is a systematic comparison of humans and other living nonhuman hominids (so-called "great apes"), aiming to identify distinctly human features in health and disease, with the overall goal of explaining human origins. We begin with a historical perspective, briefly describing how the field progressed from the earliest evolutionary insights to the current emphasis on in-depth molecular and genomic investigations of "human-specific" biology and an increased appreciation for cultural impacts on human biology. While many such genetic differences between humans and other hominids have been revealed over the last two decades, this information remains insufficient to explain the most distinctive phenotypic traits distinguishing humans from other living hominids. Here we undertake a complementary approach of "comparative physiological anthropogeny," along the lines of the preclinical medical curriculum, i.e., beginning with anatomy and considering each physiological system and in each case considering genetic and molecular components that are relevant. What is ultimately needed is a systematic comparative approach at all levels from molecular to physiological to sociocultural, building networks of related information, drawing inferences, and generating testable hypotheses. The concluding section will touch on distinctive considerations in the study of human evolution, including the importance of gene-culture interactions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHominidaeAnimalsGenomeHumansPhenotypeanthropogenycomparative physiologyhuman originshuman-specific diseasepleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID36603157
PMCPMC10151058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.