Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36603032›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Information-processing dynamics in neural networks of macaque cerebral cortex reflect cognitive state and behavior.

Thomas F Varley, Olaf Sporns, Stefan Schaffelhofer, Hansjörg Scherberger, Benjamin Dann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structural signatures of synergy and redundancy in human brain function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
  9. Broadband synergy versus oscillatory redundancy in the visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Toward a unified taxonomy of information dynamics via Integrated Information Decomposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A general framework for interpretable neural learning based on local information-theoretic goal functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas F VarleyDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University 47405-7007, Bloomington, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-9882
Olaf SpornsDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University 47405-7007, Bloomington, IN.
Stefan SchaffelhoferNeurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center 37077, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1006-971X
Hansjörg ScherbergerNeurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center 37077, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-2800
Benjamin DannNeurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center 37077, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4332-0285
German Primate Center · DEIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

CRCNS: Macaque Cortex Neuronal Network Dynamics related Cognition and Behavior R01MH121978 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SPORNS, OLAF · 2019 to 2021
$334k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the essential functions of biological neural networks is the processing of information. This includes everything from processing sensory information to perceive the environment, up to processing motor information to interact with the environment. Due to methodological limitations, it has been historically unclear how information processing changes during different cognitive or behavioral states and to what extent information is processed within or between the network of neurons in different brain areas. In this study, we leverage recent advances in the calculation of information dynamics to explore neural-level processing within and between the frontoparietal areas AIP, F5, and M1 during a delayed grasping task performed by three macaque monkeys. While information processing was high within all areas during all cognitive and behavioral states of the task, interareal processing varied widely: During visuomotor transformation, AIP and F5 formed a reciprocally connected processing unit, while no processing was present between areas during the memory period. Movement execution was processed globally across all areas with predominance of processing in the feedback direction. Furthermore, the fine-scale network structure reconfigured at the neuron level in response to different grasping conditions, despite no differences in the overall amount of information present. These results suggest that areas dynamically form higher-order processing units according to the cognitive or behavioral demand and that the information-processing network is hierarchically organized at the neuron level, with the coarse network structure determining the behavioral state and finer changes reflecting different conditions.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsCerebral CortexCognitionMacaca mulattaNeural Networks, ComputerParietal Lobebehaviorcomplexityinformation theorymotor activitynetworks

Identifiers

PMID36603032
PMCPMC9926243
OpenAlexW4313535039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.