Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36602988›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A living biobank of matched pairs of patient-derived xenografts and organoids for cancer pharmacology.

Xiaoxi Xu, Rajendra Kumari, Jun Zhou, Jing Chen, Binchen Mao, Jingjing Wang, Meiling Zheng, Xiaolong Tu, Xiaoyu An, Xiaobo Chen and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Translational 3DFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Harnessing Organoid Platforms for Nanoparticle Drug Development.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoxi XuCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Rajendra KumariCrown Bioscience Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-1681
Jun ZhouCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Jing ChenCrown Bioscience Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Binchen MaoCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Jingjing WangCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Meiling ZhengCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Xiaolong TuCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoyu AnCrown Bioscience Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Xiaobo ChenCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Likun ZhangCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Xiaoli TianShanghai Yihao Biological Technology, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
Haojie WangSuzhou NeoLogics Bioscience Co, LTD, Suzhou, China.
Xin DongSuzhou NeoLogics Bioscience Co, LTD, Suzhou, China.
Zhengzheng BaoCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Sheng GuoCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Xuesong OuyangCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Limei ShangCrown Bioscience Inc., Beijing, China.
Fei WangCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Xuefei YanCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Rui ZhangCrown Bioscience Inc., Taicang City, Jiangsu, China.
Robert G J VriesHubrecht Organoid Technology (HUB), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans CleversOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Qi-Xiang LiCrown Bioscience Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4673-1234
Crown Bioscience (China) · CNRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLSuzhou Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX)/organoid (PDO), driven by cancer stem cells (CSC), are considered the most predictive models for translational oncology. Large PDX collections reflective of patient populations have been created and used extensively to test various investigational therapies, including population-trials as surrogate subjects in vivo. PDOs are recognized as in vitro surrogates for patients amenable for high-throughput screening (HTS). We have built a biobank of carcinoma PDX-derived organoids (PDXOs) by converting an existing PDX library and confirmed high degree of similarities between PDXOs and parental PDXs in genomics, histopathology and pharmacology, suggesting "biological equivalence or interchangeability" between the two. Here we demonstrate the applications of PDXO biobank for HTS "matrix" screening for both lead compounds and indications, immune cell co-cultures for immune-therapies and engineering enables in vitro/in vivo imaging. This large biobank of >550 matched pairs of PDXs/PDXOs across different cancers could become powerful tools for the future cancer drug discovery.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsBiological Specimen BanksDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsHumansOrganoidsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36602988
PMCPMC9815646
OpenAlexW4313545691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.