Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36602987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Association of BCC Module Roll-Out in SHG meetings with changes in complementary feeding and dietary diversity among children (6-23 months)? Evidence from JEEViKA in Rural Bihar, India.

Sudipta Mondal, William Joe, Santosh Akhauri, Putul Thakur, Abhishek Kumar, Narottam Pradhan, Prasann Thatte, Rakesh Kumar Jha, Apolenarius Purty, Indrajit Chaudhuri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sudipta MondalMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-7966
William JoeInstitute of Economic Growth, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-658X
Santosh AkhauriMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.
Putul ThakurMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.
Abhishek KumarCentral University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-3195
Narottam PradhanMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.
Prasann ThatteMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.
Rakesh Kumar JhaMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.
Apolenarius PurtyJEEViKA, Bihar Rural Livelihood Promotion Society (BRLPS), Patna, India.
Indrajit ChaudhuriMonitoring Learning and Evaluation, Project Concern International, Bihar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-4402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChild dietary diversity is very low across rural communities in Bihar. Based on the experience of behavior change communication (BCC) module roll out in self-help group (SHG) sessions in rural Bihar, this study aims to assess the impact of the intervention on child dietary diversity levels in the beneficiary groups.

methodsThe study is based on a pre-post study design whereby child dietary diversity is examined for a sample of 300 children (6-23 months old from 60 village organizations) during both pre-intervention as well as post-intervention phase. The latter consists of two types of group viz. a) children whose mothers were directly exposed to BCC module in SHGs sessions and b) those who were non-participants but may have indirect exposure through spillovers of BCC activities. Econometric analysis including logistic regression as well as propensity score matching techniques are applied for estimating the changes in dietary diversity in the post-intervention phase.

resultsDuring the pre-intervention phase, 19% of the children (6-23 months) had adequate dietary diversity (eating from at least 4 out of 7 different food groups) and this increased to 49% among the exposed group and to 28% among the non-exposed group in the post-intervention phase. The exposed group have an odds ratio of 3.81 (95% CI: 2.03, 7.15) for consuming diverse diet when compared to the pre-intervention group. The propensity score matching analysis finds a 33% average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) for the group participating in BCC sessions at SHG events.

conclusionBCC roll out among SHG members is an effective mode to increase dietary diversity among infants and young children. The impact on child dietary diversity was significantly higher among mothers directly exposed to BCC modules. The BCC module also improved knowledge and awareness levels on complementary feeding and child dietary diversity.

Indexed as

DietRural PopulationCommunicationFeeding BehaviorHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaSelf-Help Groups

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.