Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36602784›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2023

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Immune-Related Gene Expression Signatures vs Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Early-Stage ERBB2/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the CALGB 40601 and PAMELA Trials.

Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Tomás Pascual, Baljit Singh, Paolo Nuciforo, Naim U Rashid, Karla V Ballman, Jordan D Campbell, Katherine A Hoadley, Patricia A Spears, Laia Pare and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Aranzazu Fernandez-MartinezLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Tomás PascualLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Baljit SinghDepartment of Pathology, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York.
Paolo NuciforoMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Naim U RashidDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Karla V BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jordan D CampbellAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Katherine A HoadleyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Patricia A SpearsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Laia PareReveal Genomics, Barcelona, Spain.
Fara Brasó-MaristanyTranslational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria ChicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ian KropYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ann PartridgeDepartment of Breast Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Llombart-CussacMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Aleix PratTranslational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Charles M PerouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Lisa A CareyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
THE ALLIANCE NCTN BIOREPOSITORY AND BIOSPECIMEN RESOURCEU24CA196171 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mine Cicek, Wendy Frankel · 2015 to 2026
$35.0M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
Optimizing prognostic and predictive algorithms using residual disease (RD) genomic biomarkers in HER2+ and TNBCR01CA229409 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LISA A CAREY, CHARLES M PEROU · 2019 to 2026
$4.0M
UNC Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233373 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A, DEES, ELIZABETH CLAIRE · 2019 to 2025
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229409NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Both tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) assessment and immune-related gene expression signatures by RNA profiling predict higher pathologic complete response (pCR) and improved event-free survival (EFS) in patients with early-stage ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. However, whether these 2 measures of immune activation provide similar or additive prognostic value is not known. Objective: To examine the prognostic ability of TILs and immune-related gene expression signatures, alone and in combination, to predict pCR and EFS in patients with early-stage ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer treated in 2 clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, a correlative analysis was performed on the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40601 trial and the PAMELA trial. In the CALGB 40601 trial, 305 patients were randomly assigned to weekly paclitaxel with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both for 16 weeks. The primary end point was pCR, with a secondary end point of EFS. In the PAMELA trial, 151 patients received neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib for 18 weeks. The primary end point was the ability of the HER2-enriched subtype to predict pCR. The studies were conducted from October 2013 to November 2015 (PAMELA) and from December 2008 to February 2012 (CALGB 40601). Data analyses were performed from June 1, 2020, to January 1, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Immune-related gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing and TILs were assessed on 230 CALGB 40601 trial pretreatment tumors and 138 PAMELA trial pretreatment tumors. The association of these biomarkers with pCR (CALGB 40601 and PAMELA) and EFS (CALGB 40601) was studied by logistic regression and Cox analyses. Results: The median age of the patients was 50 years (IQR, 42-50 years), and 305 (100%) were women. Of 202 immune signatures tested, 166 (82.2%) were significantly correlated with TILs. In both trials combined, TILs were significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P = .02). In addition to TILs, 36 immune signatures were significantly associated with higher pCR rates. Seven of these signatures outperformed TILs for predicting pCR, 6 of which were B-cell related. In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for clinicopathologic factors, including PAM50 intrinsic tumor subtype, the immunoglobulin G signature, but not TILs, was independently associated with EFS (immunoglobulin G signature-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93; P = .02; TIL-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02; P = .99). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that multiple B-cell-related signatures were more strongly associated with pCR and EFS than TILs, which largely represent T cells. When both TILs and gene expression are available, the prognostic value of immune-related signatures appears to be superior.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunoglobulin GLapatinibMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoglobulin GLapatinibPaclitaxelTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID36602784
PMCPMC9857319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.