Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36602383›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Sweat and Sebum Preferences of the Human Skin Microbiota.

Mary Hannah Swaney, Amanda Nelsen, Shelby Sandstrom, Lindsay R Kalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. mBio · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Comparative Profile of Microbiome in Normal Skin and Acne Vulgaris Skin Patients.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary Hannah SwaneyDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Amanda NelsenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Shelby SandstromDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lindsay R KalanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4980-5128

Funding

Novel antimicrobials targeting MDR pathogens from animal microbial symbiontsU19AI142720 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SAFDAR, NASIA · 2019 to 2023
$30.1M
Microbial Pathogenesis &Host Responses Training ProgramT32AI055397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BRUCE STEVEN · 2003 to 2024
$5.5M
Elucidating the Role of Microbial Community Dynamics in Wound Repair and RegenerationR35GM137828 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KALAN, LINDSAY ROBYN · 2020 to 2021
$750k
Defining the role of cobamides in skin microbiome dynamicsF31AR079846 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SWANEY, MARY HANNAH · 2022 to 2023
$51k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microorganisms inhabiting human skin must overcome numerous challenges that typically impede microbial growth, including low pH, osmotic pressure, and low nutrient availability. Yet the skin microbiota thrive on the skin and have adapted to these stressful conditions. The limited nutrients available for microbial use in this unique niche include those from host-derived sweat, sebum, and corneocytes. Here, we have developed physiologically relevant, synthetic skin-like growth media composed of compounds present in sweat and sebum. We find that skin-associated bacterial species exhibit unique growth profiles at different concentrations of artificial sweat and sebum. Most strains evaluated demonstrate a preference for high sweat concentrations, while the sebum preference is highly variable, suggesting that the capacity for sebum utilization may be a driver of the skin microbial community structure. In particular, the prominent skin commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis exhibits the strongest preference for sweat while growing equally well across sebum concentrations. Conversely, the growth of Corynebacterium kefirresidentii, another dominant skin microbiome member, is dependent on increasing concentrations of both sweat and sebum but only when sebum is available, suggesting a lipid requirement of this species. Furthermore, we observe that strains with similar growth profiles in the artificial media cluster by phylum, suggesting that phylogeny is a key factor in sweat and sebum use. Importantly, these findings provide an experimental rationale for why different skin microenvironments harbor distinct microbiome communities. In all, our study further emphasizes the importance of studying microorganisms in an ecologically relevant context, which is critical for our understanding of their physiology, ecology, and function on the skin.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSweatBacteriaHumansSebumSkinhuman microbiomesebumskinskin microbiomesweat

Identifiers

PMID36602383
PMCPMC9927561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.