ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Situation updating during discourse comprehension recruits right posterior portion of the multiple-demand network.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain-general and language-specific brain networks are differentially associated with verbal intelligence during development.iScience · 2026Article
- Uncovering hidden pathways: structural brain networks under connected speech in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Reading comprehension in L1 and L2 readers: neurocomputational mechanisms revealed through large language models.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Predicting the next sentence (not word) in large language models: What model-brain alignment tells us about discourse comprehension.Science advances · 2024Article
- Situation updating during discourse comprehension recruits right posterior portion of the multiple-demand network.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Context modulates brain state dynamics and behavioral responses during narrative comprehension.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discourse comprehension involves the construction of a mental representation of the situation model as well as a continuous update of this representation. This mental update is cognitively demanding and likely engages the multiple-demand network. However, there is little evidence for the involvement of the multiple-demand network during situation updating. In this study, we used fMRI to test whether situation updating based on the change of spatial location activated the multiple-demand network. In a discourse comprehension task, readers read two-sentence discourses in which the second sentence either continues or introduces a shift of the spatial location information presented in the first sentence. Compared to situation continuation, situation updating reliably activated the right superior parietal lobule. This area is a part of the multiple-demand network as defined by a digit N-back localizer task and locates within the dorsal attention network as defined in the previous study by Yeo et al. in 2011. Our results provide evidence for the reliable involvement of a specific area of the multiple-demand network in situation updating during high-level discourse processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.