Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601879›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2023

A cross-sectional study of Q fever in Camels: Risk factors for infection, the role of small ruminants and public health implications for desert-dwelling pastoral communities.

Peter Holloway, Matthew Gibson, Stephen Nash, Tanja Holloway, Jacqueline Cardwell, Bilal Al Omari, Ehab Abu-Basha, Punam Mangtani, Javier Guitian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pneumo-/enteritis in dromedary camels (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Zoonotic diseases transmitted from the camels.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  13. Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter HollowayThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-9724
Matthew GibsonThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Stephen NashLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tanja HollowayLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jacqueline CardwellThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Bilal Al OmariJordan University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan.
Ehab Abu-BashaJordan University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-9461
Punam MangtaniLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Javier GuitianThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Royal Veterinary College · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P02551X/1Medical Research Council MR/T02996X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Q fever represents an important 'neglected zoonosis', with high prevalences recorded across the Middle East region. Among rural desert-dwelling communities in the region, camel milk is largely consumed raw, due to perceptions of dromedaries as a uniquely clean livestock species mentioned in the Qur'an and Islamic hadith, while milk from other livestock species is usually boiled. As a result, camels present a unique public health threat among such communities from milk-borne pathogens, including Coxiella burnetii. In view of this, a cross-sectional study was conducted among dromedary herds in southern Jordan between September 2017 and October 2018, including 404 camels from 121 randomly selected herds. In addition, 510 household members associated with these herds were interviewed regarding potential high-risk practices for zoonotic transmission. Weight adjusted camel population seroprevalence for C. burnetii was 49.6% (95% CI: 44.7-54.5), with evidence of maternally derived immunity in calves ≤6 months old. Adjusted herd-level prevalence was 76.0% (95% CI 72.7-80.2). It was estimated 30.4% (144/477) of individuals consumed raw milk from infected herds monthly or more. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, seropositive status in camels was found to be associated with increasing age, high herd tick burdens, keeping the herd together throughout the year including when calving, and owning larger (>50) sheep and goat flocks, with goats presenting a higher risk than sheep. Racing camel status was found to be protective. Socioculturally appropriate interventions aimed at raising awareness of potential risks associated with drinking raw camel milk, alongside appropriate livestock management interventions, should be considered.

Indexed as

Coxiella burnetiiGoat DiseasesQ FeverAnimalsCamelusCross-Sectional StudiesGoatsPublic HealthRisk FactorsRuminantsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSheepcamelsC. burnetiiepidemiologyJordanQ feverrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36601879
PMCPMC10952281
OpenAlexW4313545716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.