Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601625›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Whole-brain dynamical modelling for classification of Parkinson's disease.

Kyesam Jung, Esther Florin, Kaustubh R Patil, Julian Caspers, Christian Rubbert, Simon B Eickhoff, Oleksandr V Popovych

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Adaptive Stimulations in a Biophysical Network Model of Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyesam JungInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-5462
Esther FlorinInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-2508
Kaustubh R PatilInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-5480
Julian CaspersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Dusseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian RubbertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Dusseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-2759
Oleksandr V PopovychInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-1764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulated whole-brain connectomes demonstrate enhanced inter-individual variability depending on the data processing and modelling approach. By considering the human brain connectome as an individualized attribute, we investigate how empirical and simulated whole-brain connectome-derived features can be utilized to classify patients with Parkinson's disease against healthy controls in light of varying data processing and model validation. To this end, we applied simulated blood oxygenation level-dependent signals derived by a whole-brain dynamical model simulating electrical signals of neuronal populations to reveal differences between patients and controls. In addition to the widely used model validation via fitting the dynamical model to empirical neuroimaging data, we invented a model validation against behavioural data, such as subject classes, which we refer to as behavioural model fitting and show that it can be beneficial for Parkinsonian patient classification. Furthermore, the results of machine learning reported in this study also demonstrated that the performance of the patient classification can be improved when the empirical data are complemented by the simulation results. We also showed that the temporal filtering of blood oxygenation level-dependent signals influences the prediction results, where filtering in the low-frequency band is advisable for Parkinsonian patient classification. In addition, composing the feature space of empirical and simulated data from multiple brain parcellation schemes provided complementary features that improved prediction performance. Based on our findings, we suggest that combining the simulation results with empirical data is effective for inter-individual research and its clinical application.

Indexed as

machine learningMRIParkinson’s diseasepatient classificationwhole-brain simulation

Identifiers

PMID36601625
PMCPMC9798283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.