ArticleBrain communications2023
Whole-brain dynamical modelling for classification of Parkinson's disease.
Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Parkinson's Disease: Bridging Gaps, Building Biomarkers, and Reimagining Clinical Translation.Cells · 2025Review
- Effective workflow from multimodal MRI data to model-based prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adolescent maturation of cortical excitation-inhibition ratio based on individualized biophysical network modeling.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Virtual brain twins: from basic neuroscience to clinical use.National science review · 2024Review
- Simulated brain networks reflecting progression of Parkinson's disease.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Adaptive Stimulations in a Biophysical Network Model of Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Discovering Themes in Deep Brain Stimulation Research Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulated whole-brain connectomes demonstrate enhanced inter-individual variability depending on the data processing and modelling approach. By considering the human brain connectome as an individualized attribute, we investigate how empirical and simulated whole-brain connectome-derived features can be utilized to classify patients with Parkinson's disease against healthy controls in light of varying data processing and model validation. To this end, we applied simulated blood oxygenation level-dependent signals derived by a whole-brain dynamical model simulating electrical signals of neuronal populations to reveal differences between patients and controls. In addition to the widely used model validation via fitting the dynamical model to empirical neuroimaging data, we invented a model validation against behavioural data, such as subject classes, which we refer to as behavioural model fitting and show that it can be beneficial for Parkinsonian patient classification. Furthermore, the results of machine learning reported in this study also demonstrated that the performance of the patient classification can be improved when the empirical data are complemented by the simulation results. We also showed that the temporal filtering of blood oxygenation level-dependent signals influences the prediction results, where filtering in the low-frequency band is advisable for Parkinsonian patient classification. In addition, composing the feature space of empirical and simulated data from multiple brain parcellation schemes provided complementary features that improved prediction performance. Based on our findings, we suggest that combining the simulation results with empirical data is effective for inter-individual research and its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.