Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601556›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Low-Dose Linezolid for Treatment of Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Anjeli Mase, Phil Lowenthal, Lisa True, Leslie Henry, Pennan Barry, Jennifer Flood

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06590428 (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid in the Treatment of Rifampin-resistant Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06590428 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid in the Treatment of Rifampin-resistant Tuberculosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2026 to 2029Enrolled280ConditionsRifampin-resistant Tuberculosis, Drug-resistant TuberculosisArmsTherapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ISCCM Position Statement on the Approach to and Management of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anjeli MaseDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5392-2506
Phil LowenthalCalifornia Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA.
Lisa TrueCalifornia Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA.
Leslie HenryCalifornia Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA.
Pennan BarryCalifornia Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-1890
Jennifer FloodCalifornia Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA.
California Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Linezolid has been prioritized for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB), but toxicity limits its use. We report treatment outcomes for MDR TB patients in California who received standard-dose linezolid vs those who switched to low-dose. Methods: We include culture-positive MDR TB cases treated with linezolid and receiving California MDR TB Service consultation during 2009-2016. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data are analyzed using univariate analysis to compare patients who received linezolid of different dosing strategies. Analysis end points are linezolid treatment duration (measure of tolerability), treatment success (completion or cure), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Sixty-nine of 194 (36%) MDR TB patients met inclusion criteria. While all patients began linezolid treatment at 600 mg daily, 39 (57%) continued at this dosage (standard-dose), and 30 (43%) switched to 300 mg daily (29%) or intermittent dosing (14%) (low dose). Patients on standard-dose linezolid were treated for 240 days, compared with 535 for those on low-dose ( Conclusions: Patients who switched to low dose tolerated linezolid longer with better treatment outcomes and fewer recurring AEs.

Indexed as

linezolidlow-dosemultidrug-resistanttreatmenttuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36601556
PMCPMC9801093
OpenAlexW4302011897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.