ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
A machine learning-based approach to predicting the malignant and metastasis of thyroid cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for thyroid cancer metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning approaches for predicting differentiated thyroid cancer recurrence using thyroglobulin levels and whole-body scans: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Risk of Unplanned Readmission or Death in Elderly Heart Failure Patients During the Vulnerable Phase: Machine Learning With SHAP Interpretation.FASEB bioAdvances · 2026Article
- Application of Digital Medicine to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Prediction of malignancy and metastasis of thyroid cancer by combined feature sets through advanced machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based classification of papillary thyroid carcinoma versus multinodular goiter using preoperative laboratory and cytology data.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- A comparative study on advanced predictive modeling of thyroid cancer recurrence using multi algorithmic machine learning frameworks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of thyroid malignancy risk using clinical and ultrasonography features and a machine learning approach.European radiology · 2025Article
- Coagulation and thyroiditis are factors associated with adverse pathological features in differentiated thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- External Validation of a Predictive Model for Thyroid Cancer Risk with Decision Curve Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- TIRADS-based artificial intelligence systems for ultrasound images of thyroid nodules: protocol for a systematic review.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies.MedComm · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based predictive model for high- grade cytokine release syndrome in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of laparoscopic surgical difficulty in gallstone patients.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Glutathione‑degrading enzymes in the complex landscape of tumors (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024Review
- A Multi-View Deep Learning Model for Thyroid Nodules Detection and Characterization in Ultrasound Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thyroid Cancer (TC) is the most common malignant disease of endocrine system, and its incidence rate is increasing year by year. Early diagnosis, management of malignant nodules and scientific treatment are crucial for TC prognosis. The first aim is the construction of a classification model for TC based on risk factors. The second aim is the construction of a prediction model for metastasis based on risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively collected approximately 70 preoperative demographic and laboratory test indices from 1735 TC patients. Machine learning pipelines including linear regression model ridge, Logistic Regression (LR) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were used to select the best model for predicting deterioration and metastasis of TC. A comprehensive comparative analysis with the prediction model using only thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS). Results: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance in the final thyroid nodule diagnosis (AUC: 0.84) and metastasis (AUC: 0.72-0.77) predictions. Its AUCs for predicting Grade 4 TC deterioration and metastasis reached 0.84 and 0.97, respectively, while none of the AUCs for Only TI-RADS reached 0.70. Based on multivariate analysis and feature selection, age, obesity, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and HBeAb were common significant risk factors for tumor progression and metastasis. Monocyte, D-dimer, T3, FT3, and albumin were common protective factors. Tumor size (11.14 ± 7.14 mm) is the most important indicator of metastasis formation. In addition, GGT, glucose, platelet volume distribution width, and neutrophil percentage also contributed to the development of metastases. The abnormal levels of blood lipid and uric acid were closely related to the deterioration of tumor. The dual role of mean erythrocytic hemoglobin concentration in TC needs to be verified in a larger patient cohort. We have established a free online tool (http://www.cancer-thyroid.com/) that is available to all clinicians for the prognosis of patients at high risk of TC. Conclusion: It is feasible to use XGBoost algorithm, combined with preoperative laboratory test indexes and demographic characteristics to predict tumor progression and metastasis in patients with TC, and its performance is better than that of Only using TI-RADS. The web tools we developed can help physicians with less clinical experience to choose the appropriate clinical decision or secondary confirmation of diagnosis results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.