ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Spatial heterogeneity of cancer associated protein expression in immunohistochemically stained images as an improved prognostic biomarker.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproducibility of Ki67 Haralick entropy as a prognostic marker in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Defining and modeling dynamic spatial heterogeneity within tumor microenvironments.Current opinion in cell biology · 2024Review
- Computational methods and biomarker discovery strategies for spatial proteomics: a review in immuno-oncology.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of new tumor biomarkers for patient stratification before therapy, for monitoring of disease progression, and for characterization of tumor biology plays a crucial role in cancer research. The status of these biomarkers is mostly scored manually by a pathologist and such scores typically, do not consider the spatial heterogeneity of the protein's expression in the tissue. Using advanced image analysis methods, marker expression can be determined quantitatively with high accuracy and reproducibility on a per-cell level. To aggregate such per-cell marker expressions on a patient level, the expression values for single cells are usually averaged for the whole tissue. However, averaging neglects the spatial heterogeneity of the marker expression in the tissue. We present two novel approaches for quantitative scoring of spatial marker expression heterogeneity. The first approach is based on a co-occurrence analysis of the marker expression in neighboring cells. The second approach accounts for the local variability of the protein's expression by tiling the tissue with a regular grid and assigning local spatial heterogeneity phenotypes per tile. We apply our novel scores to quantify the spatial expression of four different membrane markers, i.e., HER2, CMET, CD44, and EGFR in immunohistochemically (IHC) stained tissue sections of colorectal cancer patients. We evaluate the prognostic relevance of our spatial scores in this cohort and show that the spatial heterogeneity scores clearly outperform the marker expression average as a prognostic factor (CMET: p-value=0.01 vs. p-value=0.3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.