Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Mechanical mechanism of suture passer needle break in rotator cuff repair.

Chunxi Yang, Cheng Xie, Hui Liu, Zikai Hua, Bingchen An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strategies to mitigate complications in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chunxi YangDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Cheng XieDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui LiuOrthotek Laboratory ACAD, School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Zikai HuaOrthotek Laboratory ACAD, School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Bingchen AnDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Suture passer needle, as one of commonly used instrument in the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, often breaks at the notch of the needle, which originally was designed to facilitate suture with thread. Our study aimed to evaluate the suture failure rate and stitch success rate between intact suture needle and broken needle and explore the mechanism of the needle breakage and achieving better future designs. Materials and methods: From 2017 to 2021, consecutive 437 shoulders (11 cases were bilateral) underwent arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tear at the authors' institution. The breakage of needles was recorded. Finite elements analysis and mechanical test were utilized to compare stress distribution, puncture performance, and loaded puncture performance between the broken needle and the intact needle. Results: We identified 19 consecutive patients for whom the needle tip of the TruePass™ suture passer was broken in the 437 shoulder surgeries. Based on the finite element analysis of Abaqus, around the tip and the notch of the intact needle was a large stress concentration. The average puncture force required by intact needle tip and the broken tip is 61.78N and 78.23N respectively. While the intact tip with notch is easier to break than the broken tip. Conclusions: The notch of the needle is a weak point in mechanics. The broken needle without the notch still has good tendon piercing and thread passing ability. The notch of needle may be not necessary, and the tip of the needle should be modified.

Indexed as

arthroscopic surgerybroken needlemechanical mechanismrotator cuffsuture passing device

Identifiers

PMID36601437
PMCPMC9806767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.