ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022
A hybrid unsupervised and supervised learning approach for postictal generalized EEG suppression detection.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postictal electroencephalographic suppression in generalized tonic-clonic seizures: clinical correlates and predictive factors from a cross-sectional observational study.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Identification of EEG features during status epilepticus for prediction of emergent epilepsy phenotype in the mouse intra-amygdala kainic acid model using supervised learning.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Severe, Non-apneic Respiratory Dysfunction and Hypoxia following Generalized Convulsive Seizures.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Pathophysiological frameworks and emerging preventative strategies in SUDEP.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Identification of Post-Ictal Generalised EEG Suppression with Two-Channel EEG.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sudden unexpected death of epilepsy (SUDEP) is a catastrophic and fatal complication of epilepsy and is the primary cause of mortality in those who have uncontrolled seizures. While several multifactorial processes have been implicated including cardiac, respiratory, autonomic dysfunction leading to arrhythmia, hypoxia, and cessation of cerebral and brainstem function, the mechanisms underlying SUDEP are not completely understood. Postictal generalized electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (PGES) is a potential risk marker for SUDEP, as studies have shown that prolonged PGES was significantly associated with a higher risk of SUDEP. Automated PGES detection techniques have been developed to efficiently obtain PGES durations for SUDEP risk assessment. However, real-world data recorded in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) may contain high-amplitude signals due to physiological artifacts, such as breathing, muscle, and movement artifacts, making it difficult to determine the end of PGES. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach that combines the benefits of unsupervised and supervised learning for PGES detection using multi-channel EEG recordings. A K-means clustering model is leveraged to group EEG recordings with similar artifact features. We introduce a new learning strategy for training a set of random forest (RF) models based on clustering results to improve PGES detection performance. Our approach achieved a 5-second tolerance-based detection accuracy of 64.92%, a 10-second tolerance-based detection accuracy of 79.85%, and an average predicted time distance of 8.26 seconds with 286 EEG recordings using leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation. The results demonstrated that our hybrid approach provided better performance compared to other existing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.