ArticleJOR spine2022
Article in JOR spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapt, Mitigate, and Target: The Role of Oxidative Stress in Intervertebral Disc Homeostasis and Disc Degeneration.Neurospine · 2026Review
- Optimizing Cell Density and Unveiling Cytotoxic Profiles of DMSO and Ethanol in Six Cancer Cell Lines: Experimental and In Silico Insights.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Dimethyl sulfoxide-induced DNA demethylation during vitrification of early cleavage-stage embryos and possible countermeasures.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Nasal Administration of a Nanoemulsion Based on Methyl Ferulate and Eugenol Encapsulated in Chitosan Oleate: Uptake Studies in the Central Nervous System.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Development of a submicron emulsion-based delivery system to improve the anti-inflammatory activity of urolithin A.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of Tie2-Rejuvenated Nucleus Pulposus Cell Transplants from Young and Old Patient Sources Demonstrates That Age Still Matters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Recommendations for intervertebral disc notochordal cell investigation: From isolation to characterization.JOR spine · 2023Article
- The Beneficial Effects of Pterostilbene on Post-Thawed Bovine Spermatozoa.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Investigation of the Mitigation of DMSO-Induced Cytotoxicity by Hyaluronic Acid following Cryopreservation of Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cell therapy is considered a promising strategy for intervertebral disc (IVD) regeneration. However, cell products often require long-term cryopreservation, which compromises cell viability and potency, thus potentially hindering commercialization and off-the-shelf availability. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a commonly used cryoprotectant, however, DMSO is associated with cytotoxicity and cell viability loss. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DMSO on human nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) and the role of oxidative stress in DMSO-induced cytotoxicity. Furthermore, we examined the potential of antioxidant Methods: NPC were exposed to various concentrations of DMSO with or without a freezing cycle. Cell viability, cell apoptosis and necrosis rates, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and gene expression of major antioxidant enzymes were evaluated. In addition, NAC was added to cryopreservation medium containing 10% DMSO and its effects on ROS levels and cell viability were assessed. Results: DMSO concentrations ≤1% for 24 h did not significantly affect the NPC viability, whereas exposure to 5 and 10% DMSO (most commonly used concentration) caused cell viability loss (loss of 57% and 68% respectively after 24 h) and cell death in a dose- and time-dependent manner. DMSO increased intracellular and mitochondrial ROS (1.9-fold and 3.6-fold respectively after 12 h exposure to 10% DMSO) and downregulated gene expression levels of antioxidant enzymes in a dose-dependent manner. Tempering ROS through NAC treatment significantly attenuated DMSO-induced oxidative stress and supported maintenance of cell viability. Conclusions: This study demonstrated dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effects of DMSO on human NPC. The addition of NAC to the cryopreservation medium ameliorated cell viability loss by reducing DMSO-induced oxidative stress in the freeze-thawing cycle. These findings may be useful for future clinical applications of whole cells and cellular products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.