Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601341›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2022

Omission of chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: patterns of treatment and outcomes from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry.

Hannah Lois Kangleon-Tan, Jongmin Sim, Ji Young You, Eun-Shin Lee, Haemin Lee, Sun Moon Yang, Min-Ki Seong, Eun Hwa Park, Seok Jin Nam, Min Ho Park and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah Lois Kangleon-TanDepartment of Surgery, Chong Hua Hospital-Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-413X
Jongmin SimDepartment of Pathology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-1279
Ji Young YouDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-1810
Eun-Shin LeeDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-9713
Haemin LeeDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-2598
Sun Moon YangDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2638-6680
Min-Ki SeongDepartment of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-9365
Eun Hwa ParkDepartment of Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-4117
Seok Jin NamDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-8954
Min Ho ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-3815
Seokwon LeeDepartment of Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-9156
Woo-Chan ParkDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-1981
Rogelio G KangleonDepartment of Surgery, Chong Hua Hospital-Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-8606
Crisostomo B DyDepartment of Surgery, Chong Hua Hospital-Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-4938
Soo Youn BaeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-7618
Seung Pil JungDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3967-2974
Korean Breast Cancer Society
Korea University · KRChang Hua Hospital · TWCatholic University of Korea · KRChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KRDong-A University Hospital · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Although adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) is still recommended for high-risk patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal receptor (HER)-2-negative breast cancer, recent studies found that selected patients with low disease burden may be spared from CTx and receive hormonal treatment (HT) alone. This study aims to evaluate the trends of treatment (CTx + HT Methods: The Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry was queried (2000 to 2018) for women with pT1-2N0-1 hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease who underwent surgery and adjuvant systemic treatment (CTx and HT). Clinicopathologic factors, change in pattern of treatment over time, and OS for each treatment option were analyzed. Results: A total of 40,938 women were included in the study; 20,880 (51.0%) received CTx + HT, while 20,058 (49.0%) received HT only. In recent years, there has been a steady increase in the use of HT alone, from 21.0% (2000) to 64.6% (2018). In Cox regression analysis, age, type of breast and axillary operations, T and N stages, body mass index, histologic grade, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were prognostic indicators for OS. There was no significant difference between CTx + HT and HT alone in terms of OS (P = 0.126). Conclusion: Over the years, there has been a shift from CTx + HT to HT alone without a significant difference in OS. Therefore, HT alone could be a safe treatment option in selected patients, even those with T2N1 disease.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsDrug therapyEstrogen receptorHormone antagonistsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID36601341
PMCPMC9763778
OpenAlexW4312848296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.