ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022
Impact of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Hepatopancreas-Associated Microbiota in the Supralittoral Tylos ponticus (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea): Insights from Next-Generation Sequencing Approaches.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- [Long-term follow-up of a Coxiellosis outbreak in a goat flock].Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere · 2026Article
- Impact of whole-herd vaccination on a caprine coxiellosis outbreak: a longitudinal study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of an Inactivated Phase IAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Article
- Reproduction and Productivity in Dairy Cattle after Abortions Both Related and Unrelated toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Tracking the Source of Human Q Fever from a Southern French Village: Sentinel Animals and Environmental Reservoir.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sheep are considered to be one of the main reservoirs for Methods: Two identically managed and naturally Results: After primary vaccination, almost all animals from cohort VAC showed a high IgG Phase I response up until the end of the study period. In cohort CTR, the seropositivity rate varied from 35.1% to 66.3%, and the Phase I and Phase II pattern showed an undulating trend with higher IgG Phase II activity during both lambing seasons. The number of vaginal shedders was significantly reduced in cohort VAC compared to cohort CTR during the lambing season in 2019 ( Discussion: Neither the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.