Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601305›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Can the nucleic acid Ct value of discharged patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant be 35?--A retrospective study on fluctuation of nucleic acid Ct values in SNIEC mobile cabin hospital.

Xu Zhuang, Yu Zheng, Shun Wei, Wei Zhai, Qixiang Song, Min Chen, Qingrong Xu, Yiling Fan, Junhua Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xu ZhuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yu ZhengDepartment of Pulmonology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shun WeiDepartment of Information Center, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhaiDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qixiang SongDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Min ChenNursing Department, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qingrong XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yiling FanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Junhua ZhengDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Renji Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the meaning of cycle threshold (Ct) value fluctuation and the appropriateness of setting the discharge Ct value to 35, which is the current standard in Chinese guidelines. Method: A retrospective study was conducted on 95 patients with Ct value fluctuation (Ct value below 35 on day 3; group A) and 97 patients with a normal discharge process (control; group B). Their clinical characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Results: (1) There was no significant difference between the groups in age, gender distribution, number of vaccinations, initial ORF-Ct value, and initial N-Ct value. The proportion of patients complicated with chronic internal disorders, respiratory symptoms, and abnormal chest radiology in group A was significantly higher than that in group B. (2) Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the ORF-Ct or N-Ct value on day 1, but the ORF-Ct and N-Ct values of group B on days 2 to 4 were significantly higher than those of group A. (3) There was no significant difference between the groups in the ORF-Ct value at discharge, but there was a significant difference in the N-Ct value at discharge. Seven days after discharge, almost 100% of the patients had been cured. The mean negative conversion interval of nucleic acid of the patients in group A was 14.5 ± 4.6 days, which was longer than that of the patients in group B (11.8 ± 4 days). (4) Logistic regression analysis showed that the ORF-Ct value on day 2 was the key factor influencing the Ct value fluctuation. Conclusion: The fluctuation of Ct value is only a normal phenomenon in the recovery period of the disease, and there is no need for excessive intervention. It is reasonable to set the Ct value of the discharge standard to 35 and retest the nucleic acid on the 10

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19cycle threshold valuefluctuationmobile cabin hospitalomicron

Identifiers

PMID36601305
PMCPMC9806225
OpenAlexW4311873594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.