Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601282›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.

Christina Østervang, Annmarie Lassen, Thomas Schmidt, Elisabeth Coyne, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink, Charlotte Myhre Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina ØstervangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0167
Annmarie LassenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas SchmidtCenter for Health Informatics and Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elisabeth CoyneDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-600X
Karin Brochstedt DieperinkDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte Myhre JensenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The successful development and implementation of sustainable healthcare technologies require an understanding of the clinical setting and its potential challenges from a user perspective. Previous studies have uncovered a gap between what emergency departments deliver and the needs and preferences of patients and family members. This study investigated whether a user-driven approach and participatory design could provide a technical solution to bridge the identified gap. Methods: We conducted four workshops, and five one-to-one workshops with patients, family members, healthcare professionals, and information technology specialists to codesign a prototype. Revisions of the prototype were made until an acceptable solution was agreed upon and tested by the participants. The data were analyzed following iterative processes (plan → act → observe → reflect). Results: The participants emphasized the importance of a person-centered approach focusing on improved information. An already implemented system for clinicians' use only was redesigned into a unique patient module that provides a process line displaying continually updated informative features, including (1) person-centered activities, (2) general information videos, (3) a notepad, (4) estimated waiting time, and (5) the nurse and physician responsible for care and treatment. Conclusion: Participatory design is a usable approach to designing an information system for use in the emergency department. The process yielded insight into the complexity of translating ideas into technologies that can actually be implemented in clinical practice, and the user perspectives revealed the key to identifying these complex aspects. The iterations with the participants enabled us to redesign an existing technology.

Indexed as

e-healthEmergency departmentfamily membershealthcare professionalsinformation systemparticipatory researchpatientsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36601282
PMCPMC9806496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.