Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601269›Full record

ReviewAutism in adulthood2021

A Critical Review of Academic Literature Constructing Well-Being in Autistic Adults.

Gary Yu Hin Lam, Sujay Sabnis, Maria Migueliz Valcarlos, Jennifer R Wolgemuth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autism in adulthood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Supporting a 'good life' for autistic children: Autistic adults' and parents' perspectives.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trajectories of positive affect in autistic individuals during the transition to adulthood.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "A perfect storm": Autistic experiences of menopause and midlife.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  10. "I have to charge my social battery": Perspectives from autistic young adults on Quality of Life.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Editorial: Case reports in autism.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. The Foundations of Autistic Flourishing.Current psychiatry reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Annual Research Review: Shifting from 'normal science' to neurodiversity in autism science.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gary Yu Hin LamDepartment of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Sujay SabnisDepartment of Educational Psychology, College of Education, Health, and Society, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Maria Migueliz ValcarlosDepartment of Educational Psychology, College of Education, Health, and Society, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jennifer R WolgemuthDepartment of Educational Psychology, College of Education, Health, and Society, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
University of South Florida · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKMiami University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of critical autism studies has fueled efforts to interrogate how autistic people are studied and described in academic literature. While there is a call for research that promotes better well-being for autistic people, little attention has been paid to the concept of well-being itself. Just as the medical model limits critical understandings of autism in the academic literature, so too may psychological accounts of well-being limit, rather than expand, possibilities of living a good life for autistic people. The purpose of this critical review was to identify and critique how well-being in autistic adults is constructed in research. Based on a systematic search of peer-reviewed empirical research published from 2013 to 2020, we identified 63 articles that involved direct data collection with autistic adults and focused on well-being constructs such as quality of life, life satisfaction, and happiness. We examined the articles using the techniques of critical discourse analysis to discern assumptions underlying constructions of autistic well-being, with special attention to the axiological and teleological contributions of autistic perspectives in the research and writing processes. We identified several approaches through which the literature constructed autistic well-being: (1) well-being as an objective uncontested variable, (2) well-being as personal and not fixed, (3) well-being that warrants a specific measure for the autistic population, and (4) well-being as a situated account that privileges and centers autistic people's perspectives. We subject these accounts to critical analysis, pointing to how they limit and open life possibilities for autistic people. We recommend that researchers and practitioners critically reflect on how they engage autistic adults and use their input to create works that support well-being in ways that are meaningful and ethical to autistic adults, as well as do justice to changing broader narratives of autism in research and society. Lay summary:

Indexed as

adultsautismconstructcritical autism studiesdiscoursewell-being

Identifiers

PMID36601269
PMCPMC8992886
OpenAlexW3129551381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.