ArticleCureus2022
Association Between Vitamin D and Minor Salivary Gland Inflammation.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective There has been increasing research regarding the effects of vitamin D on autoimmune disorders. There is some evidence of a correlation between vitamin D levels and sicca symptoms. We attempted to evaluate the correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation of the minor salivary gland (MSG). Methods Data for 214 patients who had undergone MSG biopsy were reviewed. Eighteen patients with other autoimmune/neoplastic processes were excluded. Seventy-seven of 196 patients had serum Vitamin D levels available and were selected for this retrospective study. Demographic, clinical, and immunological features, extra-glandular manifestations, autoantibodies, and clinical laboratory tests were collected and compared between patient groups with a focus score (FS) of 0 and 1 or more. Results Out of 77, 29 patients had an FS of 0 while 48 had an FS of 1 or more. Mean vitamin D levels were noted to be lower in patients with an FS of 1 when compared to patients with an FS of 1 or more. Conclusion In this study, patients with an FS of 1 were noted to have low vitamin D levels but this association was not seen at a higher FS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.