ArticleCureus2022
The Impact of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Application Timing on Emergency Room Length of Stay in Patients With Pulmonary Edema: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) that is used to help and facilitate breathing. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of BiPAP application time on the length of emergency room (ER) stay in pulmonary edema patients.
methodThis is a retrospective cohort study that included patients who presented to the ER at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC) from June 2019 to June 2021. The eligibility criteria for BiPAP application were congestive heart failure (CHF) and type 1 and type 2 respiratory failure, The data were collected from the Track Care system. We defined early BiPAP as BiPAP application time within one hour from admission, and late BiPAP more than one hour and we calculated the percentage of discharge within four hours in each group.
resultOut of 147 fulfilling study eligibility, 64% had CHF, 23% had type 2 respiratory failure and 13% had type 1 respiratory failure. For patients discharged within four hours, 85% were in the early BiPAP and 15% were in the late BiPAP groups (p = 0.001 as compared to the late discharge group). Discharge within four hours was observed with the following percentages in the study subgroups: CHF early BiPAP (84%), late BiPAP (16%) (p = 0.004), type 1 respiratory failure early BiPAP (79%), late BiPAP (21%) (p = 0.71) and type 2 respiratory failure early BiPAP (94%), late BiPAP (6%) (p = 0.89).
conclusionOur results show that there is a significant outcome in early BiPAP application in decreasing the length of ER stay only in patients with pulmonary edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.