Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601206›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Sweet Shop Sialagogues: A Sour Solution to Sialolithiasis.

Simon Morris, Jake Ahmed, Simon Browning

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon MorrisOtolaryngology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, GBR.
Jake AhmedOtolaryngology, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Baglan, GBR.
Simon BrowningOtolaryngology, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Baglan, GBR.
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, boiled sweets have been recommended by ear, nose, and throat surgeons for their sialagogue effect in patients with sialolithiasis. This study presents an in vivo analysis of boiled sweets and solutions to determine sialagogue superiority. Six high-street boiled sweets (lemon sherbets, rhubarb sweets, mint humbugs, Werther's Original® (August Storck, Germany), Fox's Glacier Fruits® (Fox's Confectionery, Braunstone, Leicester, United Kingdom), and Chupa Chups® lollipops (Perfetti Van Melle, Breda, Netherlands)) and two solutions (malt vinegar and lemon juice) were compared to two controls (no sweet and inert plastic) in two healthy participants. Malt vinegar and lemon juice produced the highest salivary flow. The best-performing boiled sweets were Chupa Chups lollipops and lemon sherbet. Substances with the highest concentrations of citric or lactic acid were the best sialagogues. This pilot study provides a proof of concept for further investigation in this cohort of patients.

Indexed as

citrusotolaryngologysalivasalivary gland calculisialagogue

Identifiers

PMID36601206
PMCPMC9803858
OpenAlexW4310490339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.