ArticleCureus2022
Impaired Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Abnormal Blood Pressure Response: A Stress Echocardiographic Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbnormal blood pressure response (ABPR) has been reported to be a risk factor for sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We aimed to elucidate the relationship between ABPR during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) and impaired left ventricular (LV) contractile reserve based on two-dimensional strain in patients with HCM.
methodsPatients with HCM underwent ESE with treadmill exercise. Patients whose blood pressure elevation at maximum workload was lower than 20 mmHg from baseline were classified as having ABPR. Echocardiographic parameters were compared between patients with and without ABPR. Results: Of 26 patients with HCM, nine patients were diagnosed with ABPR. Significant LV outflow tract obstruction (>50 mmHg) was provoked only in one patient with ABPR (baseline to the conclusion of the exercise, 15.2 mmHg to 63.0 mmHg). Change in cardiac output (CO) and the ratio of early diastolic velocity to early annular velocity (E/e') from baseline to just after the conclusion of exercise did not differ between patients with and without ABPR (CO, 102±40% vs. 122±45%,
conclusionIn conclusion, impaired LV contractile reserve during exercise might contribute to ABPR in patients with HCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.