ArticleCureus2022
Comparison of Findings From Fecal Occult Blood Test and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy With Histopathology Among Symptomatic Saudi Adults: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background A fecal occult blood test is an established way to detect blood in stool samples. However, this diagnostic test is prone to false positives and false negatives, not to mention misuse and misinterpretation of results. In this study, we aimed to compare relevant findings among three diagnostic tests: a fecal occult blood test, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and histopathology. Methods This study used a retrospective analysis of 74 patients' electronic medical records from September 2021 to September 2022 at the Human Clinic and Gastroenterology Specialized Clinic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Symptomatic adult Saudi patients who underwent a fecal occult blood test, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and histopathology were included in the study. Results A total of 74 patients with a mean age of 43.76 ± 15.1 years were analyzed. More than half of the patients were men (63.5%). Eighteen (18) individuals tested positive through a fecal occult blood test, and 49 individuals showed a positive finding under esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Furthermore, statistical analyses revealed a significant correlation between fecal occult blood test outcomes and histopathological outcomes (p = 0.001). Conclusion A significant proportion of the sample population presented a false negative result under the fecal occult blood test. This emphasizes the importance of confirmatory endoscopic procedures and subsequent histopathology in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.