ArticleCureus2022
Patient Satisfaction With Quality of Care at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Satisfaction of patients and healthcare practitioners with the services provided by urgent care centers in Saudi Arabia, 2024: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient satisfaction levels with the services provided by the Ministry of Health Emergency Departments in Saudi Arabia.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction with emergency department services in selected Saudi hospitals: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Regional variations in inpatient satisfaction: a nationwide analysis of ministry of health hospitals in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Levels and Determinants in Outpatient Clinics of Ministry of Health Tertiary Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A Survey Analysis.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction and disease-related knowledge in otorhinolaryngology outpatient care in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patients' satisfaction with healthcare services in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Article
- Evaluating Quality of Care in Emergency Departments: Perspectives of Patients' and Health Professionals in Saudi Arabia.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2025Article
- Assessing patient satisfaction with practitioner communication: patient-centered care, hospital environment and patient trust in the public hospitals.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Key Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty in Saudi Healthcare Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Arabic Translation and Psychometric Validation of PROMIS General Life Satisfaction Short Form in the General Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The emergency department (ED) is the first contact of many individuals who require acute health services. This study was the first to be conducted among patients in different regions of Saudi Arabia to determine patient satisfaction with emergency healthcare services using the Arabic version of the Echelle de Qualité des Soins en Hospitalisation (EQS-H). Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,997 patients admitted to the ED in different hospitals in different regions of Saudi Arabia. The study was based on a self-reported questionnaire validated to assess the satisfaction of patients with ED healthcare services called EQS-H. In this study, we used an Arabic version of the questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.3. Results The study was conducted among 2,997 patients (36.7% males and 63.3% females). Regarding region, respondents from the central region represented one-third of the sample (31.7%), followed by respondents from the western, eastern, and southern regions (24.1%, 16.9%, and 14.6%, respectively). Statistical analysis showed that the average percentage score for the clarity of information was significantly higher in the central region than in other regions and was lowest in the eastern region. Individuals aged 26-35 years (B = -2.54 and P < 0.05), male sex (B = -1.63 and P < 0.05), Saudis (B = -3.81 and P < 0.05), longer ED length of stay (LOS) (B = -2.19 and P < 0.001), worse perceived health state, and lower life satisfaction scale scores were significantly associated with lower levels of satisfaction with ED services. Perceived improvement is the strongest predictor of satisfaction. Conclusion Moderate satisfaction levels were reported in both the clarity of information domain and relationship with staff domain among patients admitted to EDs in different regions of Saudi Arabia, with better results in the central region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.