ArticleCureus2022
Revisiting Non-operative Treatment of Lateral Compression Pelvic Fractures, Analysis of Rehabilitation, and Radiologic Outcomes in a Historical Cohort Using Today's Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) Stability Criteria.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType I lateral compression pelvic fractures (LC-I) have historically been treated conservatively. Inferior outcomes in a distinctive subset of these injuries have been reported, therefore their management has shifted towards surgery. Revisiting the historical series of LC-I allows us to determine whether non-operative management of these unstable patterns results in poorer outcomes. The objective was to evaluate the differences in the rehabilitation progress, fracture consolidation, and displacement in non-operatively treated LC-I fractures that would be considered unstable using today's Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) criteria.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of conservatively treated LC-I injuries in a single-level I trauma center between June 2010 and June 2014. Patients were distributed in stable (group A) and unstable (group B) groups according to the 2018 AO classification. Time to walk independently (TWI), time to return to work (TRW), fracture consolidation, and displacement were analyzed.
results34 patients, mean age of 45.5 ±14.5 years, were included. Mean TWI in groups A and B were 71.2 ±31.9 and 105.9 ±50.9 days (p=0.027). Mean TRW was 106 ±51.3 and 157 ±84 days in groups A and B, respectively (p=0.038). A difference in mean TWI and TRW of 34.7 and 51.3 days between groups was observed. No significant differences in fracture consolidation or displacement were observed.
conclusionUnstable fractures presented significantly longer TWI and TRW. The revised AO classification contributes to the identification of fracture patterns that correlate with prolonged rehabilitation in which additional treatment strategies might be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.