Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601080›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Technological interventions in improving the functionality of proteins during processing of meat analogs.

Pavan Kumar, Neelesh Sharma, Muideen Adewale Ahmed, Akhilesh K Verma, Pramila Umaraw, Nitin Mehta, Ahmed Abubakar Abubakar, Muhammad Nizam Hayat, Ubedullah Kaka, Sung-Jin Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engineering Processes for Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Current Status and Future Outlook.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peas (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Plant-Based Alternatives to Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pavan KumarInstitute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Neelesh SharmaDivision of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu, India.
Muideen Adewale AhmedInstitute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Akhilesh K VermaDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, India.
Pramila UmarawDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, India.
Nitin MehtaDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Ahmed Abubakar AbubakarInstitute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Muhammad Nizam HayatDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Ubedullah KakaDepartment of Companion Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Sung-Jin LeeDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, South Korea.
Awis Qurni SaziliDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INKangwon National University · KRKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INSardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat analogs have opened a new horizon of opportunities for developing a sustainable alternative for meat and meat products. Proteins are an integral part of meat analogs and their functionalities have been extensively studied to mimic meat-like appearance and texture. Proteins have a vital role in imparting texture, nutritive value, and organoleptic attributes to meat analogs. Processing of suitable proteins from vegetable, mycoproteins, algal, and single-cell protein sources remains a challenge and several technological interventions ranging from the isolation of proteins to the processing of products are required. The present paper reviews and discusses in detail various proteins (soy proteins, wheat gluten, zein, algal proteins, mycoproteins, pulses, potato, oilseeds, pseudo-cereals, and grass) and their suitability for meat analog production. The review also discusses other associated aspects such as processing interventions that can be adapted to improve the functional and textural attributes of proteins in the processing of meat analogs (extrusion, spinning, Couette shear cell, additive manufacturing/3D printing, and freeze structuring). '.

Indexed as

bioprintingcouette shear cellelectrospinningextrusionnon-traditional proteins

Identifiers

PMID36601080
PMCPMC9807037
OpenAlexW4313430413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.