ArticleTranslational animal science2022
Automated acquisition of top-view dairy cow depth image data using an RGB-D sensor camera.
Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Impact of Trait Measurement Error on Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Computer Vision-Derived Traits.Genes · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in animal breeding and genetics: applications, opportunities, and challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026Article
- Automatic cattle identification system based on color point cloud using hybrid PointNet++ Siamese network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Dairy Calf Body Weight from Depth Images Using Deep Learning (YOLOv8) and Threshold Segmentation with Cross-Validation and Longitudinal Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Digital and Precision Technologies in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Bibliometric Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Technical note: ShinyAnimalCV: open-source cloud-based web application for object detection, segmentation, and three-dimensional visualization of animals using computer vision.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal dimensions are essential indicators for monitoring their growth rate, diet efficiency, and health status. A computer vision system is a recently emerging precision livestock farming technology that overcomes the previously unresolved challenges pertaining to labor and cost. Depth sensor cameras can be used to estimate the depth or height of an animal, in addition to two-dimensional information. Collecting top-view depth images is common in evaluating body mass or conformational traits in livestock species. However, in the depth image data acquisition process, manual interventions are involved in controlling a camera from a laptop or where detailed steps for automated data collection are not documented. Furthermore, open-source image data acquisition implementations are rarely available. The objective of this study was to 1) investigate the utility of automated top-view dairy cow depth data collection methods using picture- and video-based methods, 2) evaluate the performance of an infrared cut lens, 3) and make the source code available. Both methods can automatically perform animal detection, trigger recording, capture depth data, and terminate recording for individual animals. The picture-based method takes only a predetermined number of images whereas the video-based method uses a sequence of frames as a video. For the picture-based method, we evaluated 3- and 10-picture approaches. The depth sensor camera was mounted 2.75 m above-the-ground over a walk-through scale between the milking parlor and the free-stall barn. A total of 150 Holstein and 100 Jersey cows were evaluated. A pixel location where the depth was monitored was set up as a point of interest. More than 89% of cows were successfully captured using both picture- and video-based methods. The success rates of the picture- and video-based methods further improved to 92% and 98%, respectively, when combined with an infrared cut lens. Although both the picture-based method with 10 pictures and the video-based method yielded accurate results for collecting depth data on cows, the former was more efficient in terms of data storage. The current study demonstrates automated depth data collection frameworks and a Python implementation available to the community, which can help facilitate the deployment of computer vision systems for dairy cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.