Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601061›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2022

Automated acquisition of top-view dairy cow depth image data using an RGB-D sensor camera.

Robert Kadlec, Sam Indest, Kayla Castro, Shayan Waqar, Leticia M Campos, Sabrina T Amorim, Ye Bi, Mark D Hanigan, Gota Morota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in animal breeding and genetics: applications, opportunities, and challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert KadlecDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Sam IndestDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Kayla CastroDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Shayan WaqarDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Leticia M CamposSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-5670
Sabrina T AmorimSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4130-2040
Ye BiSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7871-5856
Mark D HaniganSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5639-9677
Gota MorotaSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-6911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal dimensions are essential indicators for monitoring their growth rate, diet efficiency, and health status. A computer vision system is a recently emerging precision livestock farming technology that overcomes the previously unresolved challenges pertaining to labor and cost. Depth sensor cameras can be used to estimate the depth or height of an animal, in addition to two-dimensional information. Collecting top-view depth images is common in evaluating body mass or conformational traits in livestock species. However, in the depth image data acquisition process, manual interventions are involved in controlling a camera from a laptop or where detailed steps for automated data collection are not documented. Furthermore, open-source image data acquisition implementations are rarely available. The objective of this study was to 1) investigate the utility of automated top-view dairy cow depth data collection methods using picture- and video-based methods, 2) evaluate the performance of an infrared cut lens, 3) and make the source code available. Both methods can automatically perform animal detection, trigger recording, capture depth data, and terminate recording for individual animals. The picture-based method takes only a predetermined number of images whereas the video-based method uses a sequence of frames as a video. For the picture-based method, we evaluated 3- and 10-picture approaches. The depth sensor camera was mounted 2.75 m above-the-ground over a walk-through scale between the milking parlor and the free-stall barn. A total of 150 Holstein and 100 Jersey cows were evaluated. A pixel location where the depth was monitored was set up as a point of interest. More than 89% of cows were successfully captured using both picture- and video-based methods. The success rates of the picture- and video-based methods further improved to 92% and 98%, respectively, when combined with an infrared cut lens. Although both the picture-based method with 10 pictures and the video-based method yielded accurate results for collecting depth data on cows, the former was more efficient in terms of data storage. The current study demonstrates automated depth data collection frameworks and a Python implementation available to the community, which can help facilitate the deployment of computer vision systems for dairy cows.

Indexed as

depth dataimage processingprecision livestock farmingsensor camera

Identifiers

PMID36601061
PMCPMC9801406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.