Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601047›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Association of Artificially Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Urinary Tract Cancers in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Nancy E Ringel, Kathleen M Hovey, Chris A Andrews, Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani, Aladdin H Shadyab, Linda G Snetselaar, Barbara V Howard, Cheryl B Iglesia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Differential metabolic profiles by Hispanic ethnicity among male Tucson firefighters.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy E RingelUrogynecology & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kathleen M HoveyDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Chris A AndrewsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yasmin Mossavar-RahmaniDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Aladdin H ShadyabHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Linda G SnetselaarDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Barbara V HowardMedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Cheryl B IglesiaFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USMedStar Health · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Michigan · USYale University · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Insufficient data exist to conclude whether consumption of artificially sweetened beverages is associated with a higher risk of urinary tract cancers. Objective: We sought to investigate whether urinary tract cancer incidence differed among women who consumed various amounts of artificially sweetened beverages. Design setting and participants: This was a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, a multicenter longitudinal prospective study of the health of 93 676 postmenopausal women with a mean follow-up time of 13.5 yr. Women were identified at 40 clinical centers across the USA and enrolled from 1993 to 1998. Women between the ages of 50 and 79 yr were enrolled. We included women who answered questions about artificially sweetened beverage consumption and reported no prior urinary tract cancer diagnoses. The frequency of artificially sweetened beverage consumption was categorized as follows: rare artificially sweetened beverage consumption (never to fewer than one serving per week), frequent consumption (one to six servings per week), and daily consumption (more than one servings per day). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The incidence of urinary tract cancer reported during subsequent visits until February 28, 2020 was recorded. Demographic characteristics were compared between those with varying levels of artificially sweetened beverage consumption. Descriptive statistics were used to report the rates of urinary tract cancer diagnosis, and Cox regression models were constructed to determine hazard ratios and adjust for potential confounders. Results and limitations: We identified 80 388 participants who met the inclusion criteria. Most participants (64%) were infrequent consumers of artificially sweetened beverages, with 13% ( Conclusions: Frequent consumption of artificially sweetened beverages may be associated with a higher risk of kidney cancer among postmenopausal women. Patient summary: A secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study showed that higher consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was associated with a higher risk of kidney cancer.

Indexed as

Artificially sweetened beveragesArtificial sweetenerBladder cancerKidney cancerUrinary tract cancer

Identifiers

PMID36601047
PMCPMC9806707
OpenAlexW4311531706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.