Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36601041›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate and Prostate-specific Membrane Positron Emission Tomography Prior to Prostate Biopsy (MP4 Study).

Henry H Woo, Hadia Khanani, Nadine J Thompson, Brian J Sorensen, Sris Baskaranathan, Philip Bergersen, Venu Chalasani, Thomas Dean, Max Dias, James Symons and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henry H WooCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Hadia KhananiSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nadine J ThompsonSAN Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brian J SorensenSAN Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sris BaskaranathanSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Philip BergersenSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Venu ChalasaniSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas DeanSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Max DiasSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James SymonsCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Michael WinesSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anika JainSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anthony-Joe NassourSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lisa C TarlintonSAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sydney Adventist Hospital · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being utilised in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent publications have suggested that this might help identify those who can avoid biopsy. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether PET magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion could negate the need to biopsy prior to prostatectomy in a selected population of men. Design setting and participant: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for PCa is our standard of care prior to prostate biopsy. Biopsy-naïve men with one or more Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions ≥10 mm on mpMRI were invited to undergo PSMA PET/CT prior to biopsy. Following ethics approval, 60 men were recruited between September 2020 and March 2021. The key exclusion criteria included a previous history of PCa and previous prostate surgery or biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A positive PET MRI fusion scan was defined as "consistent with" as per the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center lexicon of certainty, and concordance with biopsy results was analysed. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as grade group (GG) ≥2 on pathology. A chi-square analysis was performed with statistical significance defined at Results and limitations: A total of 71 mpMRI lesions were positive on 61 (86%) PET MRI fusion scans. Fifty-nine of 61 lesions biopsied confirmed csPCa in 54 (92%). Of five of 59 lesions for which either biopsy was negative or low-grade cancer was found, three had rebiopsy of which two were confirmed to have csPCa corroborating with PET MRI fusion and one was reconfirmed to have GG1 only. For the remaining two, both had another lesion elsewhere in the gland confirming csPCa, and hence rebiopsy was not performed. Ultimately, 56 of 59 (95%) lesions with a positive PET MRI fusion scan were confirmed to have csPCa. All GG ≥3 cancers had a positive PET MRI fusion scan. Conclusions: This prospective study of PET MRI fusion assessment of men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion ≥10 mm on mpMRI confirms that the majority of men (95%) with a positive PET MRI fusion scan will have csPCa. This supports recently published retrospective data suggesting that selected men might avoid prostate biopsy prior to radical prostatectomy. Patient summary: In this research, we have confirmed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerised tomography in combination with magnetic resonance imaging could have an important role in enabling a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Using the combination of these scans, we could confidently predict the presence of aggressive prostate cancer in some men for which treatment is warranted. This means that there are some men who could possibility proceed directly to having prostate cancer surgery without the need for a confirmatory prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingPositron emission tomographyProstate biopsyProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigen

Identifiers

PMID36601041
PMCPMC9806699
OpenAlexW4312084523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.