ArticlePhysical review fluids2021
Generalized Newtonian fluid flow in porous media.
Article in Physical review fluids, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-analytical solutions of passive scalar transport in generalized Newtonian fluid flow.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Instability of Oldroyd-B Liquid Films with Odd Viscosity on Porous Inclined Substrates.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dilute Species Transport During Generalized Newtonian Fluid Flow in Porous Medium Systems.Water resources research · 2025Article
- Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory: Why Bother?ARC geophysical research · 2025Article
- Modeling flow of Carreau fluids in porous media.Physical review. E · 2023Article
- Study on Preparation and Properties of Glass Fibre Fabric Reinforced Polyphenylene Sulphide Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Towards Understanding Factors Affecting Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium Mobility in the Subsurface.Water · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-fluid-phase porous medium systems are typically modeled at an averaged length scale termed the macroscale, and Darcy's law is typically relied upon as an approximation of the momentum equation under Stokes flow conditions. Standard approaches for modeling macroscale single-fluid-phase flow of generalized Newtonian fluids (GNFs) extend the standard Newtonian model based upon Darcy's law using an effective viscosity and assuming that the intrinsic permeability is invariant with respect to fluid properties. This approach results in a need to perform an experiment for a non-Newtonian fluid, the introduction of effective parameters that are not tied to known microscale physics, and uncertainty regarding the dependencies of the fitted empirical parameter on system properties. We use the thermodynamically constrained averaging theory (TCAT) to examine the formulation and closure of a macroscale model for GNF flow that is consistent with microscale conservation principles and the second law of thermodynamics. A direct connection between microscale and macroscale quantities is used to formulate an expression for interphase momentum transfer for GNF flow in porous medium systems. Darcy's law is shown to approximate momentum transfer from the fluid phase to the solid phase. Momentum transfer is found to depend on the viscosity at the solid surface, which is only invariant for Newtonian flow. TCAT is used to derive a macroscale equation for the hydraulic resistance based on accessible fluid and solid properties. This hydraulic resistance may be used in the same way that hydraulic conductivity is typically used to model flow at the macroscale, and it includes parameters that can be calculated
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.