Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600929›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

CRISPR/Cas9 based

Mumin Ibrahim Tek, Ozer Calis, Hakan Fidan, Mehraj D Shah, Sefanur Celik, Shabir Hussain Wani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Different control of resistance to two Colletotrichum orbiculare pathogenic races 0 and 1 in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. NLR- andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. 3Bs of CRISPR-Cas mediated genome editing in plants: exploring the basics, bioinformatics and biosafety landscape.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mumin Ibrahim TekPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Ozer CalisPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Hakan FidanPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Mehraj D ShahPlant Virology and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sefanur CelikPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Shabir Hussain WaniPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Akdeniz University · TRSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powdery mildews (PM) are common and severe pathogen groups that threaten plants, and PM resistance is complex and polygenic in cucumbers. Previously

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9CsaMLOcucumberdefense responseplant susceptibilitypowdery mildew

Identifiers

PMID36600929
PMCPMC9806270
OpenAlexW4313389532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.