Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600914›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Design of field real-time target spraying system based on improved YOLOv5.

He Li, Changle Guo, Zishang Yang, Jiajun Chai, Yunhui Shi, Jiawei Liu, Kaifei Zhang, Daoqi Liu, Yufei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

He LiCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Changle GuoCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zishang YangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiajun ChaiCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yunhui ShiCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiawei LiuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kaifei ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.
Daoqi LiuChangyuan Branch, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, China.
Yufei XuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning techniques have made great progress in the field of target detection in recent years, making it possible to accurately identify plants in complex environments in agricultural fields. This project combines deep learning algorithms with spraying technology to design a machine vision precision real-time targeting spraying system for field scenarios. Firstly, the overall structure scheme of the system consisting of image acquisition and recognition module, electronically controlled spray module and pressure-stabilized pesticide supply module was proposed. After that, based on the target detection model YOLOv5s, the model is lightened and improved by replacing the backbone network and adding an attention mechanism. Based on this, a grille decision control algorithm for solenoid valve group on-off was designed, while common malignant weeds were selected as objects to produce data sets and complete model training. Finally, the deployment of the hardware system and detection model on the electric spray bar sprayer was completed, and field trials were conducted at different speeds. The experimental results show that the improved algorithm reduces the model size to 53.57% of the original model with less impact on mAP accuracy, improves FPS by 18.16%. The accuracy of on-target spraying at 2km/h, 3km/h and 4km/h speeds were 90.80%, 86.20% and 79.61%, respectively, and the spraying hit rate decreased as the operating speed increased. Among the hit rate components, the effective recognition rate was significantly affected by speed, while the relative recognition hit rate was less affected.

Indexed as

lightweight modelmachine visionprecision weedingtarget sprayingYOLOv5

Identifiers

PMID36600914
PMCPMC9806276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.