ArticleCureus2022
Investigation of Laboratory and Clinical Features of Primary Dysmenorrhea: Comparison of Magnesium and Oral Contraceptives in Treatment.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Association between dietary magnesium intake and pelvic inflammatory disease in US women: a cross-sectional study of NHANES.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The goal of this study was to identify the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of primary dysmenorrhea (PD) patients, as well as to compare the treatment options of 200 mg magnesium citrate (MgS) and combination oral contraceptive (COC) therapy. Methods This is a case-controlled prospective study consisting of 172 women with PD and a control group consisting of age-matched 172 without PD. The cases in the primary dysmenorrhea group were randomly divided into two groups, with 86 patients in the first group receiving 200 mg MgS, and 86 patients in the second group receiving COC treatment. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the severity of dysmenorrhea. VAS scoring was performed on the control group subjects included in the study at their first evaluation and the PD group subjects before treatment and at the third month of treatment (after three menstrual cycles). Results When compared to healthy controls, the PD patients had significantly more menstrual bleeding (p = 0.005), more history of maternal dysmenorrhea (p < 0.001), lower serum calcium (p < 0.001), lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (p < 0.001) and more 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency (p < 0.001). When compared to the MgS group, the patients in the COC group had significantly lower VAS scores and less need for painkillers following treatment (p < 0.001). The MgS treatment group had significantly lower post-treatment VAS values than pre-treatment VAS values. Conclusion Lower serum calcium and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were found in the presence of PD. In addition, it was observed that the administration of 200 mg MgS to PD patients significantly reduced pelvic pain in dysmenorrhea, although not as much as COC administration, and caused significant reductions in the need for painkillers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.