ArticleCureus2022
Use of an Endobronchial Blocker Where a Double-Lumen Tube Failed to Ventilate: A Case Report of a Distorted Tracheobronchial Anatomy.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One-lung ventilation (OLV) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be accomplished through several different techniques, including bronchial advancement of an endotracheal tube (ETT), use of a double-lumen tube (DLT), or placement of an endobronchial blocker. In most cases, a DLT is a mainstay of isolating and ventilating a single lung during cardiothoracic procedures. The reasons to deploy a DLT over other techniques include ease of placement, less chance of malposition, quick placement time, and quality of lung deflation. However, this case report highlights the importance of a bronchial blocker in a patient where a double-lumen tube failed to ventilate the lungs. Briefly, this young female patient had a right thoracic mass associated with ipsilateral lung collapse and moderate pleural effusion. CT-guided biopsy was planned but was deferred by the radiologist, as the patient was unable to lie in a prone position. The case was then referred to the cardiothoracic surgeon who planned a right VATS and biopsy of the lesion. In the operation theater, after induction of anesthesia, the patient could not be ventilated through a DLT, and high peak airway pressures were encountered. Initially, a size 37 left-sided DLT was used, and subsequently, sizes 35, 32, and 28 were also tried, but all these attempts to ventilate the patient remained futile. A bronchoscopy was done, which did not show any abnormality in the airway. The surgery was postponed due to an inability to ventilate the patient with a double-lumen tube. After a repeat CT scan and draining of 9.3 liters of pleural effusion over a week, the patient was again scheduled for the same procedure but with a changed anesthetic plan. This time around, the anesthetic plan was implemented successfully using a bronchial blocker to isolate the right lung. The surgery went ahead, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative period. The anesthetic management of this patient presented a unique set of challenges, which are shared in this case report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.