Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600856›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparison With the Non-TAP Group.

Pallavi Nair, Chinmaya R Behera, Rajat K Patra, Nithya Shekar, Lakshmi S Rao, Pransingh Pujari, Bandita Panda, Amaresh Mishra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07182110 (Effect of Dexamethasone-Enhanced TAP Block Mixture on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07182110 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Dexamethasone-Enhanced TAP Block Mixture on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakassed General HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsLaparoscopic CholecystectomyArmsDexamethasone enhanced TAP Block, Marcaine- 0.25%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pallavi NairDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Chinmaya R BeheraDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Rajat K PatraDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Nithya ShekarDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Lakshmi S RaoDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Pransingh PujariDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Bandita PandaDepartment of Research and Development, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Amaresh MishraDepartment of Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pain caused by laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be controlled by different methods. The study aimed to observe the efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the procedure in comparison to the non-TAP method.

methodsIn this double-blinded randomized clinical trial, the subjects who had come for cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups (n = 43 in each group). Group A received laparoscopy-guided subcostal TAP block bilaterally (0.25% bupivacaine, 20 ml each) along with parenteral analgesics (100 mg tramadol injection in 100 ml normal saline IV) SOS as rescue analgesia, and group B received parenteral analgesics (injection paracetamol 1 gm IV) eight hourly and injection tramadol 100 mg in 100 ml normal saline IV SOS as rescue analgesia.

resultA bulge was visualized by the surgeon through a laparoscope as a signature view for confirming the placement of local anesthetic in TAP. Based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for assessment of postoperative pain and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for assessment of pain at 30 minutes, four hours, eight hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively, patients of both groups were assessed. According to the VAS, the pain assessment was better in the TAP block group at 30 minutes post-surgery than in the non-TAP group. As a primary outcome, 37% of TAP block group cases were recovered without any rescue analgesia. VAS score revealed a significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) among the TAP block and non-TAP groups. PONV at four hours, eight hours, and 12 hours showed significantly lesser incidences in the TAP group as compared to the non-TAP group (p-value: 0.015, 0.028, and 0.055, respectively).

conclusionThe cost-effectiveness of the TAP block method is 20 times lesser than the non-TAP method. Thus, a laparoscopic-guided TAP block could offer better postoperative analgesia at a low cost with a similar advantage to a USG-guided TAP block.

Indexed as

laparoscopic cholecystectomynon-tap blockpain assessmenttransversus abdominis planetransversus abdominis plane block (tap block)transversus abdominis plane (tap)usg-tap block

Identifiers

PMID36600856
PMCPMC9801340
OpenAlexW4310376770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.