Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600424›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

ImmunoSep (Personalised Immunotherapy in Sepsis) international double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial: study protocol.

Antigone Kotsaki, Peter Pickkers, Michael Bauer, Thierry Calandra, Mihaela Lupse, W Joost Wiersinga, Sylvain Meylan, Frank Bloos, Tom van der Poll, Marleen A Slim and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04990232 (Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04990232 phase2completednot on this map

Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis: a Multicentre and Multinational, Double-blind, Double-dummy Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHellenic Institute for the Study of SepsisRan2021 to 2024Enrolled280ConditionsSepsisArmsAnakinra or rhIFNγ, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Cytokine storm.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New drugs for the management of tuberculosis.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Temporal Transitions of the Hyperinflammatory and Hypoinflammatory Phenotypes in Critical Illness.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Antigone Kotsaki4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Peter PickkersIntensive Care Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1104-4303
Michael BauerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Thierry CalandraDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mihaela LupseDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania.
W Joost WiersingaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands.
Sylvain MeylanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-2423
Frank BloosKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-7941
Tom van der PollDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands.
Marleen A SlimIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-040X
Niels van MourikIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcella C A MüllerIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lonneke van VughtDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarIntensive Care Unit, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aline de NooijerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lieke BakkerusDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sebastian WeisCenter for Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Nikolaos Antonakos4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Mihai G Netea *Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis *4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece egiamarel@med.uoa.gr.ORCID 0000-0003-4713-3911
Intensive Care Society · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRCenter for Clinical Studies · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHJena University Hospital · DETechnical University of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a major cause of death among hospitalised patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that immune response during sepsis cascade lies within a spectrum of dysregulated host responses. On the one side of the spectrum there are patients whose response is characterised by fulminant hyperinflammation or macrophage activation-like syndrome (MALS), and on the other side patients whose immune response is characterised by immunoparalysis. A sizeable group of patients are situated between the two extremes. Recognising immune endotype is very important in order to choose the appropriate immunotherapeutic approach for each patient resulting in the best chance to improve the outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ImmunoSep is a randomised placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial with a double-dummy design in which the effect of precision immunotherapy on sepsis phenotypes with MALS and immunoparalysis is studied. Patients are stratified using biomarkers. Specifically, 280 patients will be 1:1 randomly assigned to placebo or active immunotherapy as adjunct to standard-of-care treatment. In the active immunotherapy arm, patients with MALS will receive anakinra (recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) intravenously, and patients with immunoparalysis will receive subcutaneous recombinant human interferon-gamma. Τhe primary endpoint is the comparative decrease of the mean total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score by at least 1.4 points by day 9 from randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices; the National Ethics Committee of Greece and by the National Organization for Medicines of Greece; the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects and METC Oost Netherland for the Netherlands; the National Agency for Medicine and Medical Products of Romania; and the Commission Cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'être human of Switzerland. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04990232.

Indexed as

COVID-19SepsisClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAdult intensive & critical careIMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASES

Identifiers

PMID36600424
PMCPMC9772655
OpenAlexW4311993444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.