Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study.

Kathy Dempsey, Robyn Saw, Iris Bartula, Serigne Lo, Craig Lawn, Thomas Pennington, Andrew Spillane, Frances Boyle, Skye Dong, Mbathio Dieng and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kathy DempseyNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia kathy.dempsey@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4945-0857
Robyn SawFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Iris BartulaMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Serigne LoMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Craig LawnMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas PenningtonMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew SpillaneFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Frances BoyleFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Skye DongMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Mbathio DiengNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Donna MilnePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Linda SeamanMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Dina SaksMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Julia Lai-KwonMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.
Jake Robert ThompsonMelanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-3218
Rachael MortonNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe benefits of patient-reported feedback, using questionnaires that allow patients to report how they feel and function without any interpretation from healthcare professionals, are well established. However, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are not routinely collected in patients with melanoma in Australia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing electronic PROMs (ePROMs) into routine care from the perspectives of patients with stage III melanoma and their treating clinical team. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A minimum of 50 patients and 5 clinicians will be recruited to this prospective, longitudinal pilot study (ePROMs-MELanoma). The study uses a mixed-methods approach (quantitative PROMs questionnaires and end-of-study surveys with qualitative interviews) and commenced in May 2021 in surgical and medical melanoma clinics at two sites in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. The primary outcomes are measures of feasibility and acceptability, comprising descriptive questionnaire completion statistics, and proportion of patients who reported that these PROMs were easy to complete and measured items they considered important. Clinician and clinic staff views will be canvassed on the appropriateness of these PROMs for their patients, change in referral practice and uptake and incorporation into routine practice. Secondary aims include measurement of improvements in patients' emotional and physical health and well-being, and utility of real-time data capture and clinician feedback. All participants will complete the Distress Thermometer and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires in the clinic using a tablet computer at baseline and two to three subsequent follow-up appointments. Participants who report a score of 4 or higher on the Distress Thermometer will be triaged to complete an additional three questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire-28. Results will be generated in real time; patients with psychosocial distress or poor quality of life will discuss possible referral to appropriate allied health services with their clinician. Thematic analysis of interviews will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval obtained from St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 September 2019 (2019/ETH10558), with amendments approved on 8 June 2022. Patient consent is obtained electronically prior to questionnaire commencement. Dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international conferences, tailored presentations for clinical societies and government bodies, organisational reporting through multidisciplinary meetings and research symposia for local clinicians and clinic staff, and more informal, lay reports and presentations for consumer melanoma representative bodies and patient participants and their families. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620001149954.

Indexed as

MelanomaQuality of LifeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesDermatological tumoursMENTAL HEALTHOrganisation of health servicesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.