Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600422›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Real price of health-experiences of out-of-pocket costs in Australia: protocol for a systematic review.

Shelley Ting-Li Wang, Anne Parkinson, Danielle Butler, Hsei Di Law, Vanessa Fanning, Jane Desborough

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shelley Ting-Li WangSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-001X
Anne ParkinsonNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-0707
Danielle ButlerNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-4544
Hsei Di LawNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Vanessa FanningNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jane DesboroughNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia jane.desborough@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-4593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAustralians have substantial out-of-pocket (OOP) health costs compared with other developed nations, even with universal health insurance coverage. This can significantly affect access to care and subsequent well-being, especially for priority populations including those on lower incomes or with multimorbidity and chronic illness. While it is known that high OOP healthcare costs may contribute to poorer health outcomes, it is not clear exactly how these expenses are experienced by people with chronic illnesses. Understanding this may provide critical insights into the burden of OOP costs among this population group and may highlight policy gaps. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of qualitative studies will be conducted using Pubmed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (Ovid) and EconLit from date of inception to June 2022. Primary outcomes will include people's experiences of OOP costs such as their preferences, priorities, trade-offs and other decision-making considerations. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and methodological appraisal of included studies will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required given this is a systematic review that does not include human recruitment or participation. The study's findings will be disseminated through conferences and symposia and shared with consumers, policymakers and service providers, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022337538.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth ExpendituresAustraliaChronic DiseaseHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topichealth economicshealth policyqualitativequality in health caresystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.