Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600324›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Surgical-PEARL protocol: a multicentre prospective cohort study exploring aetiology, management and outcomes for patients with congenital anomalies potentially requiring surgical intervention.

Stuart Mires, Samantha E de Jesus, Andrew R Bamber, Andrew Mumford, Beverley Power, Catherine Bradshaw, Deborah Lawlor, Hannah Gill, Karen Luyt, Mai Baquedano and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stuart MiresTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK stuart.mires@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-8672
Samantha E de JesusBristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew R BamberTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew MumfordTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Beverley PowerCDH UK, Kings Lynn, UK.
Catherine BradshawWomen and Children's Health, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Deborah LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Hannah GillSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Karen LuytTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9806-1092
Mai BaquedanoTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tim OvertonWomen and Children's Health, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Massimo CaputoTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Clare SkerrittWomen and Children's Health, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804British Heart Foundation CH/F/20/90003Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCongenital anomalies affect over 2% of pregnancies. Surgical advances have reduced mortality and improved survival for patients with congenital anomalies potentially requiring surgical (CAPRS) intervention. However, our understanding of aetiology, diagnostic methods, optimal management, outcomes and prognostication is limited. Existing birth cohorts have low numbers of individual heterogenous CAPRS. The Surgical Paediatric congEnital Anomalies Registry with Long term follow-up (Surgical-PEARL) study aims to establish a multicentre prospective fetal, child and biological parent cohort of CAPRS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: From 2022 to 2027, Surgical-PEARL aims to recruit 2500 patients with CAPRS alongside their biological mothers and fathers from up to 15 UK centres. Recruitment will be antenatal or postnatal dependent on diagnosis timing and presentation to a recruitment site. Routine clinical data including antenatal scans and records, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) records, diagnostic and surgical data and hospital episode statistics will be collected. A detailed biobank of samples will include: parents' blood and urine samples; amniotic fluid if available; children's blood and urine samples on admission to NICU, perioperatively or if the child has care withdrawn or is transferred for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; stool samples; and surplus surgical tissue. Parents will complete questionnaires including sociodemographic and health data. Follow-up outcome and questionnaire data will be collected for 5 years. Once established we will explore the potential of comparing findings in Surgical-PEARL to general population cohorts born in the same years and centres. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical and health research authority approvals have been granted (IRAS Project ID: 302251; REC reference number 22/SS/0004). Surgical-PEARL is adopted onto the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network portfolio. Findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and through patient organisations and newsletters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12557586.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMulticenter Studies as TopicPerinatologyPregnancyProspective Studiesantenatalcongenital heart diseaseepidemiologyfetal medicinepaediatric surgeryprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36600324
PMCPMC9743368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.