Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36600224›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic.

Billy H H Cheung, Dominic C C Foo, Kent Man Chu, Michael Co, Lok Sze Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Billy H H CheungDepartment of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-7893
Dominic C C FooDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 2/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China. ccfoo@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-6597
Kent Man ChuDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 2/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-4321
Michael CoDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 2/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-051X
Lok Sze LeeLKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1051-4198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to extensive practice of online learning. Our main objective is to compare different online synchronous interactive learning activities to evaluate students' perceptions. Moreover, we also aim to identify factors influencing their perceptions in these classes.

methodsA cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study focusing on clinical year medical students' perceptions and feedback was conducted between February 2021 -June 2021 at the University of Hong Kong. Online learning activities were divided into bedside teaching, practical skill session, problem-based learning (PBL) or tutorial, and lecture. A questionnaire based on the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) was distributed to 716 clinical year students to document their perceptions.

resultsOne hundred responses were received with a response rate of 15.4% (110/716, including 96 from bedside teaching, 67 from practical skill session, 104 from PBL/tutorial, and 101 from lecture). For the mean score of the DREEM-extracted questionnaire, online PBL/tutorial scored the highest (2.72 ± 0.54), while bedside scored the lowest (2.38 ± 0.68, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference when we compared different school years (p = 0.39), age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 1.00), year of internet experience (<17 vs ≥17 years p = 0.59), or prior online class experience (p = 0.62). When asked about students' preference for online vs face-to-face classes. Students showed higher preferences for online PBL/tutorial (2.06 ± 0.75) and lectures (2.27 ± 0.81). Distraction remains a significant problem across all four learning activities. A multivariate analysis was performed regarding students' reported behavior in comparison with their perception through the DREEM-extracted questionnaire. The results showed that good audio and video quality had a significant and positive correlation with their perception of online bedside teaching, practical skill sessions, and PBL/tutorial. It also showed that the use of the video camera correlated with an increase in perception scores for lectures.

conclusionThe present analysis has demonstrated that students' perception of different online synchronous interactive learning activities varies. Further investigations are required on minimizing distraction during online classes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical educationOnline synchronous educationOnline teachingUndergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID36600224
PMCPMC9812743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.