Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599966›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023

Health outcomes and female genital mutilation/cutting: how much is due to the cutting itself?

Crista E Johnson-Agbakwu, Georgia J Michlig, Sophia Koukoui, Adeyinka M Akinsulure-Smith, Danielle S Jacobson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03249649 (Enhancing Culturally-Informed Health Care Services for Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting in Arizona), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03249649 completednot on this map

Enhancing Culturally-Informed Health Care Services for Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting in Arizona

TypeobservationalSponsorArizona State UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,736ConditionsFemale Genital Mutilation Type I Status, Female Genital Mutilation Type II Status, Female Genital Mutilation Type III StatusArmsComprehensive Healthcare Needs Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Crista E Johnson-AgbakwuSouthwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA. cejohn11@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-6453
Georgia J MichligJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sophia KoukouiUniversité de Montréal, Psychology Department, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Adeyinka M Akinsulure-SmithThe City College of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY, USA.
Danielle S JacobsonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-8099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) continues to garner global attention, FGM/C-affected migrant communities, who are often racialized minorities in the U.S., face additional challenges which may impact their physical and mental health and well-being. It has been proposed that an overly narrow focus on the female genitalia or FGM/C status alone, while ignoring the wider social experiences and perceptions of affected migrant women, will result in incomplete or misleading conclusions about the relationship between FGM/C and migrant women's health. A cross-sectional study was conducted across two waves of Somali and Somali Bantu women living in the United States, (n = 879 [wave 1], n = 654 [wave 2]). Socio-demographics, self-reported FGM/C status, perceived psychological distress, and self-reported FGM/C-related health morbidity was examined against self-reported experiences of everyday discrimination and perceived psychosocial support. In statistical models including age and educational attainment as potentially confounding socio-demographic variables, as well as self-reported FGM/C status, self-reported discrimination, and perceived psychosocial support, self-reported discrimination was the variable most strongly associated with poor physical health and psychological distress (i.e., FGM/C-related health morbidity and psychological distress), with greater perceived psychosocial support negatively associated with psychological distress, when controlling for all the other variables in the model. FGM/C status was not significantly associated with either outcome. Discrimination, more frequently reported among 'No FGM/C' (i.e., genitally intact or unmodified) women, was most frequently perceived as linked to religion and ethnicity. Our findings are consistent with views that discrimination drives negative outcomes. In this population, discrimination may include the 'quadruple jeopardy' of intersecting relationships among gender, race, religion, and migration status. We find that self-reported experiences of discrimination-and not FGM/C status per se-is associated with adverse physical and mental health consequences in our sample drawn from Somali migrant communities living in the United States, and that social support may help to mitigate these consequences. Our findings thus reinforce calls to better contextualize the relationship between FGM/C and measures of health and well-being among Somali women in the United States (regardless of their FGM/C status), taking psychosocial factors more centrally into account.Clinical Trials.Gov ID no. NCT03249649, Study ID no. 5252. Public website: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03249649.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMental HealthOutcome Assessment, Health CareReligion

Identifiers

PMID36599966
PMCPMC10159850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.