Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599892›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

A dataset for plain language adaptation of biomedical abstracts.

Kush Attal, Brian Ondov, Dina Demner-Fushman

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. APPLS: Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Plain Language Summarization.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024
    Article
  8. README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sentence-Aligned Simplification of Biomedical Abstracts.Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kush AttalLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. attalk21@alumni.wlu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-9368
Brian OndovLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-1793
Dina Demner-FushmanLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-5799

Funding

Providing timely and effortless access to reliable health-related information for decision support and educationZIALM010019 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI DEMNER-FUSHMAN, DINA · 2021 to 2025
$12.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though exponentially growing health-related literature has been made available to a broad audience online, the language of scientific articles can be difficult for the general public to understand. Therefore, adapting this expert-level language into plain language versions is necessary for the public to reliably comprehend the vast health-related literature. Deep Learning algorithms for automatic adaptation are a possible solution; however, gold standard datasets are needed for proper evaluation. Proposed datasets thus far consist of either pairs of comparable professional- and general public-facing documents or pairs of semantically similar sentences mined from such documents. This leads to a trade-off between imperfect alignments and small test sets. To address this issue, we created the Plain Language Adaptation of Biomedical Abstracts dataset. This dataset is the first manually adapted dataset that is both document- and sentence-aligned. The dataset contains 750 adapted abstracts, totaling 7643 sentence pairs. Along with describing the dataset, we benchmark automatic adaptation on the dataset with state-of-the-art Deep Learning approaches, setting baselines for future research.

Identifiers

PMID36599892
PMCPMC9811873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.