ArticleScientific reports2023
Learning-based physical models of room-temperature semiconductor detectors with reduced data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Halide-Gradient Sidewall Heterojunctions for Lateral Charge Confinement in Perovskite Single Crystal x-ray Detectors.Small methods · 2026Article
- Applications of Cd(Zn)Te Radiation Detectors in Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Charge Diffusion and Repulsion in Semiconductor Detectors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A physics based machine learning model to characterize room temperature semiconductor detectors in 3D.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identifying Defects withoutSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Room-temperature semiconductor radiation detectors (RTSD) have broad applications in medical imaging, homeland security, astrophysics and others. RTSDs such as CdZnTe, CdTe are often pixelated, and characterization of these detectors at micron level can benefit 3-D event reconstruction at sub-pixel level. Material defects alongwith electron and hole charge transport properties need to be characterized which requires several experimental setups and is labor intensive. The current state-of-art approaches characterize each detector pixel, considering the detector in bulk. In this article, we propose a new microscopic learning-based physical models of RTSD based on limited data compared to what is dictated by the physical equations. Our learning models uses a physical charge transport considering trapping centers. Our models learn these material properties in an indirect manner from the measurable signals at the electrodes and/or free and/or trapped charges distributed in the RTSD for electron-hole charge pair injections in the material. Based on the amount of data used during training our physical model, our algorithm characterizes the detector for charge drifts, trapping, detrapping and recombination coefficients considering multiple trapping centers or as a single equivalent trapping center. The RTSD is segmented into voxels spatially, and in each voxel, the material properties are modeled as learnable parameters. Depending on the amount of data, our models can characterize the RTSD either completely or in an equivalent manner.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.