Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599864›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Social feedback enhances learning in Williams syndrome.

Johan Lundin Kleberg, Charlotte Willfors, Hanna Björlin Avdic, Deborah Riby, Martyna A Galazka, Mona Guath, Ann Nordgren, Claes Strannegård

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06894264 (Emotion Processing and Regulation in People With Intellectual Disability), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06894264 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Emotion Processing and Regulation in People With Intellectual Disability

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2026 to 2028Enrolled40ConditionsIntellectual Disabilities (F70-F79), Autism Spectrum DisorderArmsEmotion regulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johan Lundin KlebergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.lundin.kleberg@su.se.
Charlotte WillforsDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna Björlin AvdicDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Deborah RibyDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Developmental Disorders, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Martyna A GalazkaGillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mona GuathDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ann Nordgren *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claes Strannegård *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a rare genetic condition characterized by high social interest and approach motivation as well as intellectual disability and anxiety. Despite the fact that social stimuli are believed to have an increased intrinsic reward value in WS, it is not known whether this translates to learning and decision making. Genes homozygously deleted in WS are linked to sociability in the general population, making it a potential model condition for understanding the social brain. Probabilistic reinforcement learning was studied with either social or non-social rewards for correct choices. Social feedback improved learning in individuals with Williams syndrome but not in typically developing controls or individuals with other intellectual disabilities. Computational modeling indicated that these effects on social feedback were mediated by a shift towards higher weight given to rewards relative to punishments and increased choice consistency. We conclude that reward learning in WS is characterized by high volatility and a tendency to learn how to avoid punishment rather than how to gain rewards. Social feedback can partly normalize this pattern and promote adaptive reward learning.

Indexed as

Williams SyndromeFeedbackHumansLearningReinforcement, PsychologyReward

Identifiers

PMID36599864
PMCPMC9813264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.