Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599697›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2023

Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Modified Atkins Diet in Persons With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mala Manral, Rekha Dwivedi, Sheffali Gulati, Kirandeep Kaur, Ashima Nehra, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Savita Sapra, Manjari Tripathi

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mala ManralFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Rekha DwivediFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Sheffali GulatiFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Kirandeep KaurFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Ashima NehraFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Ravindra Mohan PandeyFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Ashish Datt UpadhyayFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Savita SapraFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi.
Manjari TripathiFrom the Departments of Neurology (M.M., R.D., K.K., M.T.), Paediatrics (S.G., S.S.), All India Institute of Medical Science; Neuropsychology (A.N.), and Biostatistics (R.M.P., A.D.U.), All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi. mtripathiaiims@gmail.com.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesModified Atkins diet (MAD) has emerged as an adjuvant therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Most studies are in children; there is limited evidence for DRE in adults. This study aimed to investigate whether MAD along with standard drug therapy (SDT) was indeed more effective than SDT alone in reducing seizure frequency and improving psychological outcomes at 6 months in adolescents and adults with DRE (nonsurgical).

methodsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at tertiary care referral center in India. Persons with DRE aged 10-55 years attending outpatient epilepsy clinics between August 2015 and April 2019, who had more than 2 seizures per month despite using at least 3 appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) at their maximum tolerated doses and had not been on any form of diet therapy for the past 1 year, were enrolled. Patients were assessed for the eligibility and randomly assigned to receive SDT plus MAD (intervention arm) or SDT alone (control arm). The primary outcome was >50% reduction in seizure frequency, and the secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), behavior, adverse events, and rate of withdrawal at 6 months. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 243 patients were screened for eligibility; 160 patients (80 adults and 80 adolescents) were randomized to either the intervention or control arm. Demographic and clinical characteristics in both groups were comparable at baseline. At 6 months, >50% seizure reduction was seen in 26.2% in the intervention group vs 2.5% in the control group (95% CI 13.5-33.9; DISCUSSION: The MAD group demonstrated improvement in all aspects (reduction in seizure frequency and behavioral problems) compared with the control group at the end of the study. MAD is an effective modality in controlling seizures; further research is required to assess its efficacy in terms of biomarkers along with descriptive metabolomics studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The clinical trial registry of India: CTRI/2015/07/006048. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that the MAD increases the probability of seizure reduction in adolescents and adults with DRE.

Indexed as

Diet, High-Protein Low-CarbohydrateDiet, KetogenicDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyAdolescentAdultChildHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeizuresTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36599697
PMCPMC10065201
OpenAlexW4313546557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.