Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599430›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2023

Current Treatment Results of Intracranial Carotid Artery Dissection Causing Cerebral Ischemia: A Japanese Nationwide Survey.

Hiroaki Shimizu, Takahiro Ono, Takatsugu Abe, Masaaki Hokari, Yusuke Egashira, Koji Shimonaga, Masahiko Kawanishi, Kyoko Nomura, Yusuke Takahashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroaki ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takahiro OnoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takatsugu AbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine.
Masaaki HokariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital.
Yusuke EgashiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine.
Koji ShimonagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Masahiko KawanishiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University.
Kyoko NomuraDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine.
Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine.
Akita University · JPGifu University · JPKagawa University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial carotid artery dissection causing cerebral ischemia is a rare but important cause of cerebral infarction in children and adolescents. Although endovascular therapy has been reported to be effective, questions regarding the indications for intervention are yet to be addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate factors related to clinical outcomes through a nationwide survey. Overall, 35 neurosurgical centers reported patients within 2 weeks after ischemic onset due to intracranial carotid artery dissection causing cerebral ischemia treated between January 2015 and December 2020. Data on clinical and radiological findings were statistically analyzed. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 36 years (range, 7-59 years), without sex differences. Headache at onset was documented in 60.7% of the patients. Dissection findings were categorized into stenosis (71.4%) or occlusion (28.6%). Initial treatments, including various antithrombotic agent combinations in 23 (82.1%) patients, effectively improved or prevented aggravation in half of the patients. The patients with stenotic dissection were significantly more likely to experience aggravation during the initial treatment than did those with occlusive dissection (P = 0.03). In addition, the patients with moderate to severe neurological deficits on admission had poorer outcomes at discharge more frequently than did those with mild neurological deficits on admission. Eight patients undergoing endovascular therapy had no procedural complications or further aggravation after intervention. In conclusion, patients with intracranial carotid dissection causing cerebral ischemia who had a stenotic dissection were at risk of further aggravation, and endovascular therapy effectively improved or prevented aggravation.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCarotid Artery, Internal, DissectionCarotid StenosisStrokeAdolescentAdultCarotid ArteriesCerebral InfarctionChildEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleTreatment Outcomecarotid arterycerebral ischemiadissectionintracranialnationwide survey

Identifiers

PMID36599430
PMCPMC9995147
OpenAlexW4313546365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.